Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[70] Contract attribute using wrong source #71

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 14, 2024

Conversation

felipeall
Copy link
Owner

@felipeall felipeall commented Aug 14, 2024

Fixes #70

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Improved data extraction for club players to focus on joining details, enhancing accuracy.
    • Updated validation for player attributes and profiles to accommodate new data structures.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Refined validation logic for player attributes, allowing for more flexible input scenarios.
  • Tests

    • Adjusted test cases to align with the updated player data validation and structure changes.

@felipeall felipeall self-assigned this Aug 14, 2024
@felipeall felipeall linked an issue Aug 14, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 14, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent changes enhance the data extraction logic for player information in the club's API. Key updates include refining how player joining dates are retrieved and removing contract-related data handling, thereby streamlining the overall data structure. Test validations have also been adjusted to reflect these modifications, allowing for more flexible input scenarios.

Changes

Files Change Summary
app/services/clubs/players.py, tests/clubs/test_clubs_players.py Adjusted player data extraction logic to focus on joining dates and removed contract handling; updated validation schema to allow empty strings for joinedOn.
app/utils/xpath.py Removed CONTRACTS variable from Present and Past classes, affecting contract data extraction.
tests/players/test_players_injuries.py Modified validation for player injury data to make the until field optional, enhancing input flexibility.
tests/players/test_players_profile.py Changed the expected player profile key from fullName to nameInHomeCountry, reflecting updated data requirements.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Contract Attribute Using Wrong Source (#70) Contract-related data extraction has been removed.

In the meadow where bunnies hop with glee,
Changes made to set the players free!
Joining dates shine, contracts fade away,
A clearer path for data brightens the day!
Hooray for updates, let’s bounce and cheer,
In code we trust, with nothing to fear! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3e18650 and c2c3298.

Files selected for processing (5)
  • app/services/clubs/players.py (4 hunks)
  • app/utils/xpath.py (1 hunks)
  • tests/clubs/test_clubs_players.py (1 hunks)
  • tests/players/test_players_injuries.py (1 hunks)
  • tests/players/test_players_profile.py (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (8)
tests/players/test_players_injuries.py (1)

33-33: LGTM! Verify test coverage for optional "until" field.

The change to make the "until" field optional in the schema increases flexibility. Ensure that the test suite adequately covers scenarios where this field is absent.

tests/clubs/test_clubs_players.py (1)

45-45: LGTM! Verify impact of changes on test coverage.

Allowing an empty string for the "joinedOn" field and removing the "contract" field validation increases flexibility. Ensure that the test suite adequately covers these changes.

Verification successful

Test Coverage Verified for "joinedOn" Changes

The test suite in tests/clubs/test_clubs_players.py adequately covers the changes made to the "joinedOn" field, allowing for an empty string. The "contract" field is not present in this file, indicating its removal does not impact the current tests. No further action is needed.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify test coverage for changes in "joinedOn" and removal of "contract" field.

# Test: Search for test cases that handle the "joinedOn" field and ensure "contract" field is not used.
rg --type python 'joinedOn|contract' -A 5

Length of output: 74


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify test coverage for changes in "joinedOn" and removal of "contract" field.

# Test: Search for test cases that handle the "joinedOn" field and ensure "contract" field is not used.
rg --type py 'joinedOn|contract' -A 5

Length of output: 3393

app/services/clubs/players.py (1)

55-55: LGTM! Verify impact on data extraction logic.

The changes to update XPath queries for joining details and remove contract handling align with the PR objectives. Ensure that the data extraction logic remains accurate and reliable.

Verification successful

Verification Successful: XPath Query Changes

The updates to the XPath queries for joining details are correctly implemented in the data extraction logic. The logic in app/services/clubs/players.py appropriately handles both past and present player data. No issues were found with the data extraction logic.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify impact of XPath query changes on data extraction logic.

# Test: Search for usage of updated XPath queries and ensure data extraction logic is consistent.
rg --type python 'PAGE_JOINED_ON|SIGNED_FROM' -A 5

Length of output: 83


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify impact of XPath query changes on data extraction logic.

# Test: Search for usage of updated XPath queries and ensure data extraction logic is consistent.
rg --type py 'PAGE_JOINED_ON|SIGNED_FROM' -A 5

Length of output: 2496

tests/players/test_players_profile.py (4)

71-71: Verify API response for nameInHomeCountry.

Ensure that the API response includes the nameInHomeCountry field for player profiles.


Line range hint 148-148:
Verify API response for fullName.

Ensure that the API response includes the fullName field for player profiles where applicable.


Line range hint 33-33:
Verify API response for nameInHomeCountry.

Ensure that the API response includes the nameInHomeCountry field for player profiles.


Line range hint 109-109:
Verify API response for fullName.

Ensure that the API response includes the fullName field for player profiles where applicable.

app/utils/xpath.py (1)

Line range hint 1-1:
Verify impact of CONTRACTS removal.

Ensure that the removal of the CONTRACTS variable from the Present and Past classes does not affect any dependent functionality.

Verification successful

No Impact from CONTRACTS Removal

The removal of the CONTRACTS variable from the Present and Past classes does not affect any other part of the codebase, as there are no references to CONTRACTS found. This suggests that the variable was unused or its functionality has been refactored.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if any functionality depends on the `CONTRACTS` variable.

# Test: Search for any references to `CONTRACTS` in the codebase.
rg --type python 'CONTRACTS'

Length of output: 59


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if any functionality depends on the `CONTRACTS` variable.

# Test: Search for any references to `CONTRACTS` in the codebase using the correct file type for Python.
rg --type py 'CONTRACTS'

Length of output: 24

@felipeall felipeall merged commit 62cfa0c into main Aug 14, 2024
1 check passed
@felipeall felipeall deleted the 70-contract-attribute-using-wrong-source branch August 14, 2024 08:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Contract Attribute Using Wrong Source
1 participant