Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

⬆️ 10.2.0 #461

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 14, 2021
Merged

⬆️ 10.2.0 #461

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 14, 2021

Conversation

chapulina
Copy link
Contributor

Preparation for 10.2.0 release.

Comparison to 10.1.0 shows some commits that have already been released because the merge strategy changed:

sdformat10_10.1.0...sdf10

Signed-off-by: Louise Poubel <[email protected]>
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Jan 13, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #461 (998572a) into sdf10 (2cf2c8c) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##            sdf10     #461   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   87.78%   87.78%           
=======================================
  Files          62       62           
  Lines        9577     9577           
=======================================
  Hits         8407     8407           
  Misses       1170     1170           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 2cf2c8c...998572a. Read the comment docs.

@chapulina chapulina merged commit 8f054b6 into sdf10 Jan 14, 2021
@chapulina chapulina deleted the chapulina/10.2.0 branch January 14, 2021 03:05
* [Pull request 363](https://github.com/osrf/sdformat/pull/363)

1. Param\_TEST: test parsing +Inf and -Inf.
* [Pull request 277](https://github.com/osrf/sdformat/pull/277)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this was in 10.0.0

probably some of the other ones too

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ahh thanks. I didn't see it on 10.x.x below and assumed it was new on 10, but now I realize many of them could have been there since before 10.0.0 😕

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🔮 dome Ignition Dome 🏢 edifice Ignition Edifice
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants