Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Properly flush unique queues on startup (#23154) #23200

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 6, 2023

Conversation

GiteaBot
Copy link
Contributor

Backport #23154

There have been a number of reports of PRs being blocked whilst being checked which have been difficult to debug. In investigating #23050 I have realised that whilst the Warn there is somewhat of a miscall there was a real bug in the way that the LevelUniqueQueue was being restored on start-up of the PersistableChannelUniqueQueue.

Next there is a conflict in the setting of the internal leveldb queue name - This wasn't being set so it was being overridden by other unique queues.

This PR fixes these bugs and adds a testcase.

Thanks to @brechtvl for noticing the second issue.

Fix #23050
and others

There have been a number of reports of PRs being blocked whilst being
checked which have been difficult to debug. In investigating go-gitea#23050 I
have realised that whilst the Warn there is somewhat of a miscall there
was a real bug in the way that the LevelUniqueQueue was being restored
on start-up of the PersistableChannelUniqueQueue.

Next there is a conflict in the setting of the internal leveldb queue
name - This wasn't being set so it was being overridden by other unique
queues.

This PR fixes these bugs and adds a testcase.

Thanks to @brechtvl  for noticing the second issue.

Fix go-gitea#23050
and others

---------

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <[email protected]>
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added this to the 1.18.6 milestone Feb 28, 2023
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added the lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. label Mar 3, 2023
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. and removed lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. labels Mar 6, 2023
@delvh delvh added lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. reviewed/wait-merge This pull request is part of the merge queue. It will be merged soon. and removed lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. labels Mar 6, 2023
@lunny lunny added lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. and removed lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. labels Mar 6, 2023
@lunny lunny merged commit 13f304d into go-gitea:release/v1.18 Mar 6, 2023
@lunny lunny removed the reviewed/wait-merge This pull request is part of the merge queue. It will be merged soon. label Mar 6, 2023
@go-gitea go-gitea locked and limited conversation to collaborators May 3, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. type/bug
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants