You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
It's great to have a %config(noreplace) when building RPMs. Now we stumbled over the need to specify %config(missingok).
This is especially made for cases where the package manager is happy with the file being there or missing. Given files you only need within postInstall scripts, symlinks that vanish or others.
Describe the solution you'd like
Would be great to simply be able to pass type: config|missingok to a "content".
Describe alternatives you've considered
Writing spec files by hand and not using nfpm. Which is somewhat not a real alternative 😇
Search
I did search for other open and closed issues before opening this.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
It's great to have a
%config(noreplace)
when building RPMs. Now we stumbled over the need to specify%config(missingok)
.This is especially made for cases where the package manager is happy with the file being there or missing. Given files you only need within postInstall scripts, symlinks that vanish or others.
Describe the solution you'd like
Would be great to simply be able to pass
type: config|missingok
to a "content".Describe alternatives you've considered
Writing spec files by hand and not using nfpm. Which is somewhat not a real alternative 😇
Search
Code of Conduct
Additional context
https://rpm-software-management.github.io/rpm/manual/spec.html#missingok-since-rpm--414-in-standalone-form
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: