-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Revise the lang
attribute problem
#1542
Comments
I think number 3 is the best solution. |
The third option seems the best to me. |
I like number 3 too, but it would mean we’d partially revert our previous removal of all comments from the example HTML in favor of the docs. If people don’t remove the comment, they add bloat to the |
I'm in favor of either 1 or 3. Not the biggest fan of putting in comments everywhere, but it might be justified in this case. |
@mathiasbynens yeah, but like with the GA tracking code, we should also make this somehow obvious. However, If I think more about it, providing just |
+1 for option 3
|
Option 3, for sure. The empty lang attribute value would be glossed over by a lot of people, I think. This is a tricky situation in which we're providing something that isn't quite ready for prime time so adding a comment is more than justified. |
As an aside, I just looked back through a couple of projects I've spun up over the past few months and I had no lang attribute at all in them. This wasn't production code (unless you count book code samples,) so I might have caught it eventually, but removing the attribute tripped me up and I know better. |
Well, the empty attribute value is not really problematic, even if you were to use this in production – you just wouldn’t have the benefits of having defined the language. I’m starting to lean towards option 1, if only because it doesn’t cause any harm if it’s ignored (i.e. if people leave the attribute value empty). |
👍 for (1) or (3) |
Leaning more for option 1. My preference is to have as few comments in the boilerplate on the get go. We use to explain the meta |
For now, we'll be going with just adding Thanks for the feedback everyone! |
In the past we decided¹ to remove the `lang` attribute due to the fact that developers were often forgetting to update its value. This change turned out not to be the best solution because some of the users: * didn't read the documentation, and thus, they found the absence of the `lang` attribute confusing, or didn't even knew they had to add it * didn't notice the absence of the `lang` attribute, and thus, forgot to include it (expecting it to be there) To make things more clearer and to remind users that they need to specify the primary language of the document, this commit reintroduces the `lang` attribute, while leaving its value to `""`. Using `lang=""` has the exact same effect as not specifying the `lang` attribute at all, in both cases the language being treated as unknown². - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ¹ #1110 ² From WHATWG (http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/elements.html#attr-lang): "To determine the language of a node, user agents must look at the nearest ancestor element (including the element itself if the node is an element) that has a lang attribute in the XML namespace set or is an HTML element and has a lang in no namespace attribute set. That attribute specifies the language of the node (regardless of its value). If both the lang attribute in no namespace and the lang attribute in the XML namespace are set on an element, user agents must use the lang attribute in the XML namespace, and the lang attribute in no namespace must be ignored for the purposes of determining the element's language. If neither the node nor any of the node's ancestors, including the root element, have either attribute set, but there is a pragma-set default language set, then that is the language of the node. If there is no pragma-set default language set, then language information from a higher-level protocol (such as HTTP), if any, must be used as the final fallback language instead. In the absence of any such language information, and in cases where the higher-level protocol reports multiple languages, the language of the node is unknown, and the corresponding language tag is the empty string. If the resulting value is not a recognized language tag, then it must be treated as an unknown language having the given language tag, distinct from all other languages." - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Close #1542.
|
In the past we decided¹ to remove the `lang` attribute due to the fact that developers were often forgetting to update its value. This change turned out not to be the best solution because some of the users: * didn't read the documentation, and thus, they found the absence of the `lang` attribute confusing, or didn't even knew they had to add it * didn't notice the absence of the `lang` attribute, and thus, forgot to include it (expecting it to be there) To make things more clearer and to remind users that they need to specify the primary language of the document, this commit reintroduces the `lang` attribute, while leaving its value to `""`. Using `lang=""` has the exact same effect as not specifying the `lang` attribute at all, in both cases the language being treated as unknown². - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ¹ h5bp/html5-boilerplate#1110 ² From WHATWG (http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/elements.html#attr-lang): "To determine the language of a node, user agents must look at the nearest ancestor element (including the element itself if the node is an element) that has a lang attribute in the XML namespace set or is an HTML element and has a lang in no namespace attribute set. That attribute specifies the language of the node (regardless of its value). If both the lang attribute in no namespace and the lang attribute in the XML namespace are set on an element, user agents must use the lang attribute in the XML namespace, and the lang attribute in no namespace must be ignored for the purposes of determining the element's language. If neither the node nor any of the node's ancestors, including the root element, have either attribute set, but there is a pragma-set default language set, then that is the language of the node. If there is no pragma-set default language set, then language information from a higher-level protocol (such as HTTP), if any, must be used as the final fallback language instead. In the absence of any such language information, and in cases where the higher-level protocol reports multiple languages, the language of the node is unknown, and the corresponding language tag is the empty string. If the resulting value is not a recognized language tag, then it must be treated as an unknown language having the given language tag, distinct from all other languages." - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ref: h5bp/html5-boilerplate#1542.
Signed-off-by: Bo-Yi Wu <[email protected]>
active bug topic elsewhere: |
In the past we decided¹ to remove the `lang` attribute due to the fact that developers were often forgetting to update its value. This change turned out not to be the best solution because some of the users: * didn't read the documentation, and thus, they found the absence of the `lang` attribute confusing, or didn't even knew they had to add it * didn't notice the absence of the `lang` attribute, and thus, forgot to include it (expecting it to be there) To make things more clearer and to remind users that they need to specify the primary language of the document, this commit reintroduces the `lang` attribute, while leaving its value to `""`. Using `lang=""` has the exact same effect as not specifying the `lang` attribute at all, in both cases the language being treated as unknown². - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ¹ h5bp/html5-boilerplate#1110 ² From WHATWG (http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/elements.html#attr-lang): "To determine the language of a node, user agents must look at the nearest ancestor element (including the element itself if the node is an element) that has a lang attribute in the XML namespace set or is an HTML element and has a lang in no namespace attribute set. That attribute specifies the language of the node (regardless of its value). If both the lang attribute in no namespace and the lang attribute in the XML namespace are set on an element, user agents must use the lang attribute in the XML namespace, and the lang attribute in no namespace must be ignored for the purposes of determining the element's language. If neither the node nor any of the node's ancestors, including the root element, have either attribute set, but there is a pragma-set default language set, then that is the language of the node. If there is no pragma-set default language set, then language information from a higher-level protocol (such as HTTP), if any, must be used as the final fallback language instead. In the absence of any such language information, and in cases where the higher-level protocol reports multiple languages, the language of the node is unknown, and the corresponding language tag is the empty string. If the resulting value is not a recognized language tag, then it must be treated as an unknown language having the given language tag, distinct from all other languages." - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Close h5bp/html5-boilerplate#1542.
Fixes #5945 `lang="en"` may be wrong to users, use empty string instead. See : h5bp/html5-boilerplate#1542
Fixes #5945 `lang="en"` may be wrong to users, use empty string instead. See : h5bp/html5-boilerplate#1542
Fixes #5945 `lang="en"` may be wrong to users, use empty string instead. See : h5bp/html5-boilerplate#1542
Fixes #5945 `lang="en"` may be wrong to users, use empty string instead. See : h5bp/html5-boilerplate#1542
Problem Overview
Developers often forgot to change the value of the
lang
attribute, so we decided to remove it from<html>
.The change isn't quite good enough as some users:
lang
attribute confusing, or won't even know that they should be adding itlang
attribute, and thus will forget to add it anyway (maybe expecting it to be there)Specification and Browsers
From http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/elements.html#attr-lang:
So, it turns out that not specifying the
lang
attribute is the same as specifying it with the value of""
, in both case the language being treated asunknown
.From what I've tested, browser respect the
empty string
rule (if you find one that doesn't, please let us know).Solution?
Having the language being treated as
unknown
isn't really much better thenlang="en"
(e.g.: VoiceOver on iOS seems to be defaulting toEnglish
when the language isunknown
, no matter what the default language is).So, I think we should make it more obvious to the user that they need to specify the
lang
attribute, by maybe:lang=""
lang=""
and a commentThoughts?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: