Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add gateway to packet_router_packet_down_v1 #316

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

macpie
Copy link
Member

@macpie macpie commented Apr 7, 2023

No description provided.

@macpie macpie force-pushed the macpie/OneStreamToRuleThemAll branch from 004904b to 56386be Compare June 28, 2023 17:53
@@ -71,6 +71,7 @@ message packet_router_packet_down_v1 {
bytes payload = 1;
window_v1 rx1 = 2;
window_v1 rx2 = 3;
bytes gateway = 4;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why add this overhead to every packet headed to the gateway?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No, this is an experiment to handle data from Router to HPR with less streams.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Gotcha but it’s also the proto message that the gateway receives right? If so you may want to put the downlink packet in an envelope with the gateway in the outer envelope

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We could leave it empty when it goes to gateway

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems like that breaks some system boundaries in favor of some optimization. Let’s chat this through before nailing it down

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants