Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

verdepcheck #527

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

verdepcheck #527

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

pawelru
Copy link
Contributor

@pawelru pawelru commented Jun 9, 2023

No description provided.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 9, 2023

badge

Code Coverage Summary

Filename                      Stmts    Miss  Cover    Missing
--------------------------  -------  ------  -------  ----------------------------------------------
R/tm_a_pca.R                    821     821  0.00%    73-1019
R/tm_a_regression.R             710     710  0.00%    93-887
R/tm_data_table.R               171     171  0.00%    59-282
R/tm_file_viewer.R              172     172  0.00%    39-241
R/tm_front_page.R               127     116  8.66%    64-206
R/tm_g_association.R            327     327  0.00%    90-476
R/tm_g_bivariate.R              649     489  24.65%   125-700, 748, 754, 758, 869, 886, 904, 924-946
R/tm_g_distribution.R          1025    1025  0.00%    111-1258
R/tm_g_response.R               346     346  0.00%    86-496
R/tm_g_scatterplot.R            712     712  0.00%    143-946
R/tm_g_scatterplotmatrix.R      278     259  6.83%    79-374, 428, 442
R/tm_missing_data.R            1034    1034  0.00%    59-1229
R/tm_outliers.R                 944     944  0.00%    77-1143
R/tm_t_crosstable.R             251     251  0.00%    82-371
R/tm_variable_browser.R         815     810  0.61%    62-1294
R/utils.R                       122     122  0.00%    74-352
R/zzz.R                           1       1  0.00%    2
TOTAL                          8505    8310  2.29%

Diff against main

Filename      Stmts    Miss  Cover
----------  -------  ------  --------
TOTAL             0       0  +100.00%

Results for commit: 1c97d4b

Minimum allowed coverage is 80%

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 9, 2023

Unit Tests Summary

  1 files    5 suites   0s ⏱️
16 tests 16 ✔️ 0 💤 0
49 runs  49 ✔️ 0 💤 0

Results for commit 2329500.

@averissimo averissimo mentioned this pull request Jul 26, 2023
11 tasks
@averissimo
Copy link
Contributor

Closes in favor of #538

@averissimo averissimo closed this Aug 8, 2023
averissimo added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 14, 2023
WIP :: parent issue:
insightsengineering/nestdevs-tasks#7

Supersede:
* #527

### 🔴 Checklist for PR Reviewer

- [ ] Tag yourself next to this repo on
insightsengineering/nestdevs-tasks#7
- [x] Package versions are the same or higher than `main`
- [x] Package list is the same
  - Only exception is `rmarkdown` (may have been removed on `Suggests`)
- [x] All packages in `Imports`, `Depends` & `Suggests` are in new
section `Config/Needs/verdepcheck`
- [x] Added entry to `NEWS.md`
- [x] Last `scheduled.yaml` action was run succesfully _(all 4
strategies)_
- important: it's not the last commit, it's the one that runs 4
`Scheduled 🕰️ / Dependency` actions
- [x] `scheduled.yaml` SHOULD NOT have any push on any branches

### 🔴 What's needed before merging?

This PR depends on some upstream changes that need to be
finalized/merged before being ready to review.

#### Change in code

* `verdepcheck.yml` action (see comments)
  - [x] Remove `on: push` section 
  - [x] Change branch to main

#### PRS

- [x] verdepcheck
  * insightsengineering/verdepcheck#24
  * insightsengineering/verdepcheck#26
- [x] verdepcheck-action
  * insightsengineering/r-verdepcheck-action#16

### Changes description

* Adds minimum version for packages `DESCRIPTION`
* Adds `Config/Need/verdepcheck` section in `DESCRIPTION`
* Updates verdepcheck action
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants