Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adds min package version #1012

Merged
merged 15 commits into from
Oct 23, 2023
Merged

Adds min package version #1012

merged 15 commits into from
Oct 23, 2023

Conversation

averissimo
Copy link
Contributor

@averissimo averissimo commented Jul 26, 2023

WIP :: parent issue: insightsengineering/nestdevs-tasks#7

Supersede:

🔴 Checklist for PR Reviewer

Scheduled 🕰️ (max strategy fails due to tidyverse/ggplot2#5436 corrected upstream)

  • Tag yourself next to this repo on Specify minimal version dependencies + add action nestdevs-tasks#7
  • Package versions are the same or higher than main
  • Package list is the same
    • Only exception is rmarkdown (may have been removed on Suggests)
  • All packages in Imports, Depends & Suggests are in new section Config/Needs/verdepcheck
  • Added entry to NEWS.md
  • Last scheduled.yaml action was run succesfully (all 4 strategies)
    • important: it's not the last commit, it's the one that runs 4 Scheduled 🕰️ / Dependency actions
  • scheduled.yaml SHOULD NOT have any push on any branches

🔴 What's needed before merging?

This PR depends on some upstream changes that need to be finalized/merged before being ready to review.

Change in code

  • verdepcheck.yml action (see comments)
    • Remove on: push section
    • Change branch to main

PRS

Changes description

  • Adds minimum version for packages DESCRIPTION
  • Adds Config/Need/verdepcheck section in DESCRIPTION
  • Updates verdepcheck action

@averissimo averissimo changed the title Verdepcheck action Adds min package version Jul 26, 2023
DESCRIPTION Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 26, 2023

badge

Code Coverage Summary

Filename                                   Stmts    Miss  Cover    Missing
---------------------------------------  -------  ------  -------  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R/abnormal_by_baseline.R                      67       2  97.01%   76-77
R/abnormal_by_marked.R                        54       5  90.74%   115-119
R/abnormal_by_worst_grade_worsen.R           115       3  97.39%   233-235
R/abnormal_by_worst_grade.R                   39       0  100.00%
R/abnormal.R                                  42       0  100.00%
R/analyze_variables.R                        199       9  95.48%   476-477, 493, 696-697, 702-703, 721-722
R/analyze_vars_in_cols.R                     176      34  80.68%   167-168, 205-210, 225, 239-240, 248-256, 262-268, 347-353
R/combination_function.R                       9       0  100.00%
R/compare_variables.R                        124      17  86.29%   127-131, 243, 321-330, 384-385, 391
R/control_incidence_rate.R                    20       8  60.00%   32-35, 38-41
R/control_logistic.R                           7       0  100.00%
R/control_step.R                              23       1  95.65%   58
R/control_survival.R                          15       0  100.00%
R/count_cumulative.R                          49       1  97.96%   63
R/count_missed_doses.R                        33       0  100.00%
R/count_occurrences_by_grade.R               105       4  96.19%   156-158, 161
R/count_occurrences.R                         74       1  98.65%   92
R/count_patients_events_in_cols.R             68       1  98.53%   62
R/count_patients_with_event.R                 46       0  100.00%
R/count_patients_with_flags.R                 57       4  92.98%   71-72, 77-78
R/count_values.R                              26       0  100.00%
R/cox_regression_inter.R                     154       0  100.00%
R/cox_regression.R                           161       0  100.00%
R/coxph.R                                    167       7  95.81%   191-195, 239, 254, 262, 268-269
R/d_pkparam.R                                406       0  100.00%
R/decorate_grob.R                            168      40  76.19%   232-263, 323-325, 331, 352-389
R/desctools_binom_diff.R                     621      64  89.69%   53, 88-89, 125-126, 129, 199, 223-232, 264, 266, 286, 290, 294, 298, 353, 356, 359, 362, 422, 430, 439, 444-447, 454, 457, 466, 469, 516-517, 519-520, 522-523, 525-526, 593, 604-616, 620, 663, 676, 680
R/df_explicit_na.R                            30       0  100.00%
R/estimate_multinomial_rsp.R                  49       1  97.96%   60
R/estimate_proportion.R                      201      12  94.03%   75-82, 86, 91, 298, 465, 570
R/fit_rsp_step.R                              36       0  100.00%
R/fit_survival_step.R                         36       0  100.00%
R/formatting_functions.R                     174       3  98.28%   145, 155, 280
R/g_forest.R                                 438      21  95.21%   199, 319, 336-337, 342-343, 356, 372, 419, 450, 526, 535, 616-620, 630, 705, 708, 832
R/g_lineplot.R                               200      30  85.00%   162, 175, 204, 230-233, 309-316, 334-335, 341-351, 443, 449, 451
R/g_step.R                                    68       1  98.53%   109
R/g_waterfall.R                               47       0  100.00%
R/h_adsl_adlb_merge_using_worst_flag.R        73       0  100.00%
R/h_biomarkers_subgroups.R                    42       0  100.00%
R/h_cox_regression.R                         110       0  100.00%
R/h_logistic_regression.R                    468       3  99.36%   206-207, 276
R/h_map_for_count_abnormal.R                  57       2  96.49%   77-78
R/h_pkparam_sort.R                            15       0  100.00%
R/h_response_biomarkers_subgroups.R           75       0  100.00%
R/h_response_subgroups.R                     171      12  92.98%   257-270
R/h_stack_by_baskets.R                        67       3  95.52%   68-69, 95
R/h_step.R                                   180       0  100.00%
R/h_survival_biomarkers_subgroups.R           79       0  100.00%
R/h_survival_duration_subgroups.R            200      12  94.00%   259-271
R/imputation_rule.R                           17       2  88.24%   54-55
R/incidence_rate.R                            95       7  92.63%   53-60
R/individual_patient_plot.R                  133       0  100.00%
R/kaplan_meier_plot.R                        683      65  90.48%   230-233, 273-308, 317-321, 530, 717-719, 727-729, 761-762, 935-938, 1161, 1478-1489
R/logistic_regression.R                      102       0  100.00%
R/missing_data.R                              21       3  85.71%   32, 66, 76
R/odds_ratio.R                               108       0  100.00%
R/prop_diff_test.R                            90       0  100.00%
R/prop_diff.R                                262      16  93.89%   72-75, 107, 271-278, 417, 477, 582
R/prune_occurrences.R                         57      10  82.46%   138-142, 188-192
R/response_biomarkers_subgroups.R             60       0  100.00%
R/response_subgroups.R                       165       4  97.58%   268, 312-314
R/riskdiff.R                                  48       7  85.42%   85-88, 95, 105-106
R/rtables_access.R                            38       4  89.47%   159-162
R/score_occurrences.R                         20       1  95.00%   124
R/split_cols_by_groups.R                      49       0  100.00%
R/stat.R                                      59       3  94.92%   73-74, 129
R/summarize_ancova.R                          97       1  98.97%   180
R/summarize_change.R                          29       0  100.00%
R/summarize_colvars.R                         12       2  83.33%   72-73
R/summarize_coxreg.R                         174       6  96.55%   196-197, 204, 340-341, 434
R/summarize_glm_count.R                      166      29  82.53%   158, 162-213, 261-262
R/summarize_num_patients.R                   101       9  91.09%   105-107, 156-157, 240-245
R/summarize_patients_exposure_in_cols.R       98       1  98.98%   56
R/survival_biomarkers_subgroups.R             60       0  100.00%
R/survival_coxph_pairwise.R                   75       9  88.00%   59-67
R/survival_duration_subgroups.R              174       0  100.00%
R/survival_time.R                             49       0  100.00%
R/survival_timepoint.R                       120       7  94.17%   126-132
R/utils_checkmate.R                           68       0  100.00%
R/utils_default_stats_formats_labels.R        95       3  96.84%   408-411
R/utils_factor.R                             109       2  98.17%   84, 302
R/utils_grid.R                               111       5  95.50%   149, 258-264
R/utils_rtables.R                             90       7  92.22%   24, 31-35, 376-377
R/utils.R                                    137      10  92.70%   92, 94, 98, 118, 121, 124, 128, 137-138, 311
TOTAL                                       9613     514  94.65%

Diff against main

Filename      Stmts    Miss  Cover
----------  -------  ------  --------
TOTAL             0       0  +100.00%

Results for commit: 93cae1d

Minimum allowed coverage is 80%

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 26, 2023

Unit Tests Summary

       1 files       80 suites   1m 18s ⏱️
   781 tests    761 ✔️   20 💤 0
1 658 runs  1 030 ✔️ 628 💤 0

Results for commit 93cae1d.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@averissimo
Copy link
Contributor Author

Blocked until discussion about rmarkdown is resolved insightsengineering/teal.logger#49 (comment)

@averissimo averissimo force-pushed the verdepcheck_action branch 2 times, most recently from dce14b7 to 7cb096f Compare October 18, 2023 12:15
DESCRIPTION Outdated
lattice,
lubridate,
knitr (>= 1.42),
rmarkdown (>= 2.19),
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

pls move it down to keep alphabetical order

DESCRIPTION Show resolved Hide resolved
averissimo and others added 2 commits October 20, 2023 13:54
Co-authored-by: Pawel Rucki <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: André Veríssimo <[email protected]>
Copy link
Contributor

@pawelru pawelru left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hey @shajoezhu, this guy is good to go. tern is right after release. Shall we move on and merge?

@shajoezhu
Copy link
Contributor

Fantastic! Please pull the trigger! @pawelru

@shajoezhu shajoezhu merged commit ae1a386 into main Oct 23, 2023
30 of 31 checks passed
@shajoezhu shajoezhu deleted the verdepcheck_action branch October 23, 2023 01:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants