Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Vertically align plot with table in g_lineplot #1153

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 5, 2023
Merged

Vertically align plot with table in g_lineplot #1153

merged 3 commits into from
Dec 5, 2023

Conversation

edelarua
Copy link
Contributor

@edelarua edelarua commented Dec 4, 2023

Pull Request

Fixes #1152

@edelarua edelarua added the sme label Dec 4, 2023
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 4, 2023

badge

Code Coverage Summary

Filename                                   Stmts    Miss  Cover    Missing
---------------------------------------  -------  ------  -------  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R/abnormal_by_baseline.R                      68       2  97.06%   78-79
R/abnormal_by_marked.R                        55       5  90.91%   78-82
R/abnormal_by_worst_grade_worsen.R           116       3  97.41%   240-242
R/abnormal_by_worst_grade.R                   60       0  100.00%
R/abnormal.R                                  43       0  100.00%
R/analyze_variables.R                        190      10  94.74%   489-490, 506, 530, 686-687, 692-693, 711-712
R/analyze_vars_in_cols.R                     179      35  80.45%   168-169, 184, 207-212, 227, 241-242, 250-258, 264-270, 349-355
R/combination_function.R                       9       0  100.00%
R/compare_variables.R                        124      17  86.29%   131-135, 247, 325-334, 389-390, 396
R/control_incidence_rate.R                    20       8  60.00%   32-35, 38-41
R/control_logistic.R                           7       0  100.00%
R/control_step.R                              23       1  95.65%   58
R/control_survival.R                          15       0  100.00%
R/count_cumulative.R                          50       1  98.00%   67
R/count_missed_doses.R                        34       0  100.00%
R/count_occurrences_by_grade.R               107       4  96.26%   144-146, 149
R/count_occurrences.R                        115       1  99.13%   108
R/count_patients_events_in_cols.R             67       1  98.51%   53
R/count_patients_with_event.R                 47       0  100.00%
R/count_patients_with_flags.R                 58       4  93.10%   56-57, 62-63
R/count_values.R                              27       0  100.00%
R/cox_regression_inter.R                     154       0  100.00%
R/cox_regression.R                           161       0  100.00%
R/coxph.R                                    167       7  95.81%   191-195, 239, 254, 262, 268-269
R/d_pkparam.R                                406       0  100.00%
R/decorate_grob.R                            173      40  76.88%   235-266, 326-328, 339, 360-397
R/desctools_binom_diff.R                     621      64  89.69%   53, 88-89, 125-126, 129, 199, 223-232, 264, 266, 286, 290, 294, 298, 353, 356, 359, 362, 422, 430, 439, 444-447, 454, 457, 466, 469, 516-517, 519-520, 522-523, 525-526, 593, 604-616, 620, 663, 676, 680
R/df_explicit_na.R                            30       0  100.00%
R/estimate_multinomial_rsp.R                  50       1  98.00%   63
R/estimate_proportion.R                      205      12  94.15%   78-85, 89, 94, 315, 482, 588
R/fit_rsp_step.R                              36       0  100.00%
R/fit_survival_step.R                         36       0  100.00%
R/formatting_functions.R                     181       3  98.34%   145, 155, 280
R/g_forest.R                                 438      21  95.21%   199, 319, 336-337, 342-343, 356, 372, 419, 450, 526, 535, 616-620, 630, 705, 708, 832
R/g_lineplot.R                               206      34  83.50%   168, 181, 210, 236-239, 315-322, 340-341, 347-357, 449, 455, 457, 499-500, 504-505
R/g_step.R                                    68       1  98.53%   109
R/g_waterfall.R                               47       0  100.00%
R/h_adsl_adlb_merge_using_worst_flag.R        73       0  100.00%
R/h_biomarkers_subgroups.R                    45       0  100.00%
R/h_cox_regression.R                         110       0  100.00%
R/h_logistic_regression.R                    468       3  99.36%   206-207, 276
R/h_map_for_count_abnormal.R                  57       2  96.49%   77-78
R/h_pkparam_sort.R                            15       0  100.00%
R/h_response_biomarkers_subgroups.R           76       0  100.00%
R/h_response_subgroups.R                     171      12  92.98%   257-270
R/h_stack_by_baskets.R                        67       3  95.52%   68-69, 95
R/h_step.R                                   180       0  100.00%
R/h_survival_biomarkers_subgroups.R           81       0  100.00%
R/h_survival_duration_subgroups.R            200      12  94.00%   259-271
R/imputation_rule.R                           17       2  88.24%   54-55
R/incidence_rate.R                            96       7  92.71%   44-51
R/individual_patient_plot.R                  133       0  100.00%
R/kaplan_meier_plot.R                        688      65  90.55%   236-239, 279-314, 323-327, 538, 725-727, 735-737, 769-770, 943-946, 1169, 1495-1506
R/logistic_regression.R                      102       0  100.00%
R/missing_data.R                              21       3  85.71%   32, 66, 76
R/odds_ratio.R                               109       0  100.00%
R/prop_diff_test.R                            91       0  100.00%
R/prop_diff.R                                265      16  93.96%   62-65, 97, 282-289, 432, 492, 597
R/prune_occurrences.R                         57      10  82.46%   138-142, 188-192
R/response_biomarkers_subgroups.R             61       0  100.00%
R/response_subgroups.R                       185       4  97.84%   267, 315-317
R/riskdiff.R                                  59       7  88.14%   102-105, 114, 124-125
R/rtables_access.R                            38       4  89.47%   159-162
R/score_occurrences.R                         20       1  95.00%   124
R/split_cols_by_groups.R                      49       0  100.00%
R/stat.R                                      59       3  94.92%   73-74, 129
R/summarize_ancova.R                         101       1  99.01%   172
R/summarize_change.R                          30       0  100.00%
R/summarize_colvars.R                         13       2  84.62%   72-73
R/summarize_coxreg.R                         178       6  96.63%   201-202, 209, 346-347, 442
R/summarize_glm_count.R                      170      29  82.94%   160, 164-214, 259-260
R/summarize_num_patients.R                    99       9  90.91%   108-110, 160-161, 252-257
R/summarize_patients_exposure_in_cols.R       96       1  98.96%   42
R/survival_biomarkers_subgroups.R             63       0  100.00%
R/survival_coxph_pairwise.R                   76       9  88.16%   51-59
R/survival_duration_subgroups.R              184       0  100.00%
R/survival_time.R                             79       0  100.00%
R/survival_timepoint.R                       113       7  93.81%   120-126
R/utils_checkmate.R                           68       0  100.00%
R/utils_default_stats_formats_labels.R       136       4  97.06%   72, 577-580
R/utils_factor.R                             109       2  98.17%   84, 302
R/utils_ggplot.R                              68      68  0.00%    39-125
R/utils_grid.R                               111       5  95.50%   149, 258-264
R/utils_rtables.R                             90       7  92.22%   24, 31-35, 376-377
R/utils_split_funs.R                          52       2  96.15%   81, 93
R/utils.R                                    137      10  92.70%   92, 94, 98, 118, 121, 124, 128, 137-138, 311
TOTAL                                       9959     591  94.07%

Diff against main

Filename      Stmts    Miss  Cover
----------  -------  ------  --------
TOTAL             0       0  +100.00%

Results for commit: 2fb36df

Minimum allowed coverage is 80%

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results

@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 4, 2023

Unit Tests Summary

       1 files       82 suites   1m 4s ⏱️
   806 tests    781 ✔️   25 💤 0 ❌
1 706 runs  1 056 ✔️ 650 💤 0 ❌

Results for commit 2fb36df.

ayogasekaram
ayogasekaram approved these changes Dec 5, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@ayogasekaram ayogasekaram left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks @edelarua

@edelarua edelarua merged commit 4c11291 into main Dec 5, 2023
24 checks passed
@edelarua edelarua deleted the 1152_align_lineplot_tbl@main branch December 5, 2023 00:51
@pawelru pawelru mentioned this pull request Dec 6, 2023
Merged
pawelru added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 6, 2023
@pawelru
add axis parameter to plot_grid() (#1155)
20a84ff 
follow-up on #1153

Integration test warns for chevron:
```
── Warning ('test-mng01.R:18:3'): mng01 works as expected with custom argument values ──
  Graphs cannot be vertically aligned unless the axis parameter is set. Placing graphs unaligned.
  Backtrace:
      ▆
   1. └─chevron::mng01_main(...) at test-mng01.R:18:3
   2.   └─base::lapply(...)
   3.     └─tern (local) FUN(X[[i]], ...)
   4.       └─cowplot::plot_grid(p, tbl, ncol = 1, align = "v")
   5.         └─cowplot::align_plots(...)
```

It might happen that snapshot test will fail. In such case please kindly
provide some help. I have re-run snapshots locally and I got differences
for unrelated graphs like KM Plots. This has to do with my local
settings. I might be unable to get same graphs like in CI.
This was referenced Dec 6, 2023
Closed
Merged
@shajoezhu
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @edelarua , I was wondering if we need to update tmc downstream, or if this happens automatically

@edelarua
Copy link
Contributor Author

edelarua commented Dec 7, 2023

Hi @edelarua , I was wondering if we need to update tmc downstream, or if this happens automatically

@shajoezhu it will update automatically in tmc - no action needed!

@shajoezhu
Copy link
Contributor

Brilliant! Thanks Em

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@ayogasekaram ayogasekaram ayogasekaram approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
sme
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Feature Request]: Align table and plot in g_lineplot
3 participants
@edelarua @shajoezhu @ayogasekaram