-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 386
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
term: DVC-file -> .dvc file from Utkarsh work (2nd chunk) #1403
Conversation
Your trial has endedChoose a plan to resume monitoring your Sites and Pull Requests. If you need help, check the Manage Your Plan and Test Usage guide. |
targets DVC-files to remove. | ||
targets `.dvc` files to remove. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@efiop we need to do this same for the core repo when possible please. See iterative/dvc/issues/3960
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@jorgeorpinel Wait, that looks wrong. It should be "stages or .dvc
files to remove". It works with dvc.yaml
too.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was assuming remove only works with .dvc files like move. OK, great to know, so let's go with this:
targets DVC-files to remove. | |
targets `.dvc` files to remove. | |
targets stages (found in `dvc.yaml`) or `.dvc` files to remove. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was thinking of not to mention this yet, only after we release docs for run
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
remove
only has --outs
flag now, and 0.94
's remove
and 1.0
's remove
behavior are completely different.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
OK, good to know @skshetry . Please open a separate issue or PR from the core repo PR where remove
is changed (usual process). This PR is about updating "DVC-file" terminology. Thanks
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@utkarshsingh99 OK here's the plan! I reviewed half of the files here so far. Please copy this branch to your fork and RE-OPEN the PR from there (so that you can contribute to it because you won't be able to commit here). Then address by review 👇 and ping me so we can continue it there.
I'll just close this draft PR when that happens. Thanks
A couple questions to Ruslan are still open but I'll close this now in favor of #1408 |
Actually just #1403 (review) now, and it's more of a comment/reminder, not a question. Abandoning this ship! ⚓ |
Cc @utkarshsingh99 sorry, I'm basically stealing your work a little here. Need to move things along and the git operations were a little complex.