Descriptors for all parsers

[LorMun]

No description provided.

[uhafner]

This is exactly the right way! Some minor comments, but the general concept is 👍

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (master@dcb56f6). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is 82.88%.

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master     #548   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage          ?   87.28%           
  Complexity        ?     1593           
=========================================
  Files             ?      258           
  Lines             ?     5103           
  Branches          ?      545           
=========================================
  Hits              ?     4454           
  Misses            ?      474           
  Partials          ?      175           

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ	Complexity Δ
...c/main/java/edu/hm/hafner/analysis/Categories.java	100.00% <ø> (ø)	5.00 <0.00> (?)
...va/edu/hm/hafner/analysis/FullTextFingerprint.java	89.47% <ø> (ø)	15.00 <0.00> (?)
.../java/edu/hm/hafner/analysis/RegexpLineParser.java	83.33% <ø> (ø)	4.00 <0.00> (?)
...hafner/analysis/descriptor/AcuCobolDescriptor.java	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)	0.00 <0.00> (?)
...u/hm/hafner/analysis/descriptor/AjcDescriptor.java	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)	0.00 <0.00> (?)
...ner/analysis/descriptor/AndroidLintDescriptor.java	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)	0.00 <0.00> (?)
...ner/analysis/descriptor/AnsibleLintDescriptor.java	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)	0.00 <0.00> (?)
...hafner/analysis/descriptor/AntJavacDescriptor.java	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)	0.00 <0.00> (?)
.../analysis/descriptor/Armcc5CompilerDescriptor.java	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)	0.00 <0.00> (?)
...r/analysis/descriptor/ArmccCompilerDescriptor.java	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)	0.00 <0.00> (?)
... and 204 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update dcb56f6...4825b22. Read the comment docs.

[uhafner]

Superseded by #572

[uhafner]

I merged your changes into a new branch targeting an upcoming release 10.0.0. I already integrated the new library API in my autograding action, works like a charm 🎉 In a next step I'll apply those changes in the warnings plugin.

I needed to change the API slightly, does that still work for you? Keys of the parser are now the actual IDs and not the names. I also integrated the descriptions for some of the analysis tools (CheckStyle, SpotBugs, and PMD).

[LorMun]

Perfect, thank you very much!
From what I've seen there is will be no problem with the changed API for me.

Do you have an idea when 10.0.0 will be released?

[uhafner]

You can always grab the latest release from https://repo.jenkins-ci.org/incrementals/edu/hm/hafner/analysis-model/ (if the build of my PR succeeds). Currently the latest release candidate is 10.0.0-rc3952.178341475878.

You can get it automatically in maven by adding the following snippet to the pom (see autograding-github-action/pom.xml and the corresponding Java class AutoGradingAction):

  <repositories>
    <repository>
      <id>repo.jenkins-ci.org</id>
      <url>https://repo.jenkins-ci.org/public/</url>
    </repository>
    <repository>
      <id>incrementals.jenkins-ci.org</id>
      <url>https://repo.jenkins-ci.org/incrementals/</url>
    </repository>
  </repositories>

I would still like to see how this new API works in the warnings plugin before doing a non-revertible release. Maybe it makes sense that we discuss that in Zoom?

[LorMun]

A Zoom call sounds like a good idea.
I'm pretty packed this week. Does next week suit you?