Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add back support for Ember 3.16 #34

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 27, 2021

Conversation

simonihmig
Copy link
Contributor

As discussed in #33 (comment), this introduces a conditional to support Ember 3.16+ while still using the latest modifier capabilities when possible. @embroider/macros was chosen for this instead of the usual ember-compatibility-helpers, as that seems to be the more future-proof solution to me, especially allowing an easier transition to an eventual native "v2" addon.

@simonihmig
Copy link
Contributor Author

@josemarluedke this is what we discussed yesterday in #33. Hope it now works across all previously supported Ember versions, but we can only be sure once you enable CI to run (being a new "untrusted" contributor here) 😉

@josemarluedke
Copy link
Owner

@simonihmig changes are looking good! I think we need to add to the dependencies and import @embroider/macros.

As discussed in josemarluedke#33 (comment), this introduces a conditional to support Ember 3.16+ while still using the latest modifier capabilities when possible. `@embroider/macros` was chosen for this instead of the usual `ember-compatibility-helpers`, as that seems to more future-proof solution to me, especially allowing an easier transition to an eventual native "v2" addon.
@simonihmig
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hm, idk how in heaven I managed to mess this up. I did have everything in place and tests were passing locally. Probably while working on the other PR I somehow lost some changes before committing. All green now! 😆

@josemarluedke josemarluedke merged commit 6e67c4a into josemarluedke:main May 27, 2021
@josemarluedke
Copy link
Owner

Published in v0.7.0. Thank you for working on this @simonihmig!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants