Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feat: move to hatchling? #145

Closed
agoose77 opened this issue May 16, 2022 · 7 comments · Fixed by #165
Closed

Feat: move to hatchling? #145

agoose77 opened this issue May 16, 2022 · 7 comments · Fixed by #165

Comments

@agoose77
Copy link

agoose77 commented May 16, 2022

I am aware that @blink1073 has been looking into using hatch for building e.g. nbconvert.

I've also used it to write my own build plugin, and it's very easy to use. Given that hatch already supports PEP 621, PEP 517, PEP 660 et al, we'd be getting a lot of nice features up front.

Relevant Issues:

@agoose77 agoose77 changed the title Move to hatchling? Feat: move to hatchling? May 16, 2022
@blink1073
Copy link
Contributor

blink1073 commented May 16, 2022

Hi @agoose77, I'm actually already testing out a plugin in jupyter/notebook#6425. My goal is indeed to have that replace our use of jupyter-packaging across the board.

@blink1073
Copy link
Contributor

@ofek
Copy link

ofek commented Jun 13, 2022

This is done I think

@jasongrout
Copy link
Member

Just to be clear, if the hatch solution pans out, is the plan to sunset this project and eventually archive it?

@blink1073
Copy link
Contributor

Just to be clear, if the hatch solution pans out, is the plan to sunset this project and eventually archive it?

Yes, that is correct

@ofek
Copy link

ofek commented Aug 12, 2022

Has the blog post been released yet?

@blink1073
Copy link
Contributor

Not yet 😅. I'm tracking the migration effort in jupyterlab/hatch-jupyter-builder#54

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants