Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

e2e for service export #739

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Mar 17, 2020
Merged

e2e for service export #739

merged 5 commits into from
Mar 17, 2020

Conversation

itsmurugappan
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Add e2e test for kn service export

Changes

  • Add e2e test for 'kn service export'
  • Refactor unit test for 'kn service export'
  • Drop the traffic information if only one revision is present in the traffic

knative-prow-robot
knative-prow-robot reviewed Mar 13, 2020
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@itsmurugappan: 1 warning.

In response to this:

Description

Add e2e test for kn service export

Changes

  • Add e2e test for 'kn service export'
  • Refactor unit test for 'kn service export'
  • Drop the traffic information if only one revision is present in the traffic

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

test/e2e/service_export_import_apply_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot added the size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. label Mar 13, 2020
@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CLA. label Mar 13, 2020
mattmoor
mattmoor reviewed Mar 13, 2020
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@mattmoor mattmoor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Produced via:
gofmt -s -w $(find -path './vendor' -prune -o -path './third_party' -prune -o -type f -name '*.go' -print)

mattmoor
mattmoor reviewed Mar 13, 2020
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@mattmoor mattmoor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Produced via:
gofmt -s -w $(find -path './vendor' -prune -o -path './third_party' -prune -o -type f -name '*.go' -print)

mattmoor
mattmoor reviewed Mar 13, 2020
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@mattmoor mattmoor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Produced via:
gofmt -s -w $(find -path './vendor' -prune -o -path './third_party' -prune -o -type f -name '*.go' -print)

mattmoor
mattmoor reviewed Mar 13, 2020
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@mattmoor mattmoor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Produced via:
gofmt -s -w $(find -path './vendor' -prune -o -path './third_party' -prune -o -type f -name '*.go' -print)

test/e2e/service_export_import_apply_test.go Show resolved Hide resolved
test/e2e/service_export_import_apply_test.go Show resolved Hide resolved
@maximilien
Copy link
Contributor

/ok-to-test

@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot added the ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. label Mar 13, 2020
@knative-metrics-robot
Copy link

The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
Say /test pull-knative-client-go-coverage to re-run this coverage report

File Old Coverage New Coverage Delta
pkg/kn/commands/service/export.go 82.1% 82.3% 0.2

maximilien
maximilien approved these changes Mar 17, 2020
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@maximilien maximilien left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is a good start. Let get this in. There are some issues already open that could be seen as v2 or refactoring. Thanks for the sustain contribution @itsmurugappan. Cheers 🍻

/lgtm

@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 17, 2020
@knative-prow-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: itsmurugappan, maximilien

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 17, 2020
@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot merged commit a858a25 into knative:master Mar 17, 2020
@itsmurugappan itsmurugappan mentioned this pull request Mar 18, 2020
Closed
rhuss pushed a commit to rhuss/knative-client that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2020
@itsmurugappan @rhuss
e2e for service export (knative#739)
bda69ba 
* e2e for service export

* e2e for service export

* e2e for service export

* e2e for service export

* e2e for service export

Signed-off-by: Roland Huß <[email protected]>
# Conflicts:
#	test/e2e/service_export_import_apply_test.go
@navidshaikh navidshaikh added the backport/candidate Consider this PR to be backported to the release branch label Apr 15, 2020
knative-prow-robot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2020
@rhuss @maximilien
@dsimansk @navidshaikh @MIBc @itsmurugappan
Pr/release 0.13.2 backports (#806)
b67f302 
* (refactor) address the e2e extract / refactor of issue #763 (#765)

* (refactor) address the e2e extract / refactor of issue #763

* various updates to address reviewers feedback

* renamed lib/test/integration to lib/test and package to test

Signed-off-by: Roland Huß <[email protected]>
# Conflicts:
#	CHANGELOG.adoc
#	test/e2e/service_export_import_apply_test.go
#	test/e2e/trigger_test.go

* fix(plugin): Fix plugin lookup with file ext on Windows (#774)

* fix(plugin): Fix plugin lookup with file ext on Windows

* chore: Update changelog

* fix: Reflect review feedback

* fix: Reflect review feedback and add future todo

Signed-off-by: Roland Huß <[email protected]>
# Conflicts:
#	CHANGELOG.adoc

* fix(issue #762): correct error message when updating service (#778)

* fix(issue #762): correct error message when updating service

* correct message when updating service and passing many names
* fix issue with TestServiceUpdateWithMultipleImages running create vs update

* * added TestServiceDescribeWithMultipleNames
* added TestServiceCreateWithMultipleNames
* fix error message for service delete since many names can be passed

* Use vendored deps while running e2e locally (#783)

Also set GO111MODULE=on unconditionally

* Update sink binding create usage string (#785)

* Add "--target-utilization" to manage "autoscaling.knative.dev/targetUtilizationPercentage" annotation (#788)

* Support setting "autoscaling.knative.dev/targetUtilizationPercentage" annotation.

Signed-off-by: Roland Huß <[email protected]>
# Conflicts:
#	test/e2e/service_options_test.go

* Remove the delete propagation flag (#770)

* Remove the delete propagation flag

In it's current state it now takes me about 25 seconds for the `kn delete`
to complete. Before #682 it used to be
almost immediate. This is because we now pass in the
`DeletePropagationBackground` flag. I believe this is a mistake, not only
because of the 20+ seconds of additional time to delete things, but IMO
the CLI should talk to the server in the same way regardless of the --wait
flag. That flag should just be a CLI thing to indicate if the user wants the CLI
to wait for the server to complete but not HOW the server should do the delete.

Signed-off-by: Doug Davis <[email protected]>

* try just tweaking the --no-wait flag

Signed-off-by: Doug Davis <[email protected]>

* Fix error when output is set to name (#775)

* fix error when output is set to name

* add e2e test

* change to flags/listprint.go

Signed-off-by: Roland Huß <[email protected]>
# Conflicts:
#	test/e2e/basic_workflow_test.go

* Show all revisions when run `service describe -v` (#790)

* The `kn service describe -v` command shows repetitive revisions, because
  the revision would be covered by next one.

* Fix resource listing with -oname flag (#799)

* Fix resource listing with -oname flag

* add e2e tests

Signed-off-by: Roland Huß <[email protected]>
# Conflicts:
#	test/e2e/ping_test.go
#	test/e2e/revision_test.go
#	test/e2e/route_test.go
#	test/e2e/source_apiserver_test.go
#	test/e2e/source_binding_test.go
#	test/e2e/trigger_test.go

* Make wait, no-wait and async flags per bool var CLI convention (#802)

* Make wait, no-wait and async flags per bool var CLI convention

 Fixes #800

 - Deprecated bool vars can be supported for CLI convention
 - Bind --async flag value to --no-wait
 - Only one flag among [wait, no-wait, async] can be provided, else raise an error

* Simplify conditionals

* Add unit tests for deprecated flag async

* Fix a typo

* e2e: Foreground delete for revisions and services in e2e (#794)

* e2e: Foreground delete for revisions and services in e2e

 to avoid any race conditions and flakes

* Use --wait instead of --no-wait=false

Signed-off-by: Roland Huß <[email protected]>
# Conflicts:
#	test/e2e/basic_workflow_test.go
#	test/e2e/revision_test.go

* e2e: Run tekton e2e against pipeline v0.11.1 (#803)

* Use buildah task from master branch and paramterize FORMAT

* Configure pipeline v0.11.1

* DNM: Run tekton e2e in this PR

* Revert "DNM: Run tekton e2e in this PR"

This reverts commit 903f5be.

* Update CHANGELOG for v0.13.2 (#804)

* Pin serving to v0.13.2 and update version command (#797)

* Pin serving v0.13.2 dep to v0.13.2

* Update version command

 now points to serving v0.13.2 and eventing v0.13.6

* Copy go.sum as generated in CI

Signed-off-by: Roland Huß <[email protected]>
# Conflicts:
#	go.mod
#	go.sum
#	vendor/modules.txt

* add missing vendored files

* fixed error reporting for traffics tests

* Updated test

* fix formatting

* e2e for service export (#739)

* e2e for service export

* e2e for service export

* e2e for service export

* e2e for service export

* e2e for service export

Signed-off-by: Roland Huß <[email protected]>
# Conflicts:
#	test/e2e/service_export_import_apply_test.go

Co-authored-by: dr.max <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: David Simansky <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Navid Shaikh <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Lv Jiawei <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Doug Davis <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Ying Chun Guo <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Murugappan Chetty <[email protected]>
@navidshaikh navidshaikh added backport/pr A backport PR which is target to a release branch. and removed backport/candidate Consider this PR to be backported to the release branch labels Apr 20, 2020
@rhuss rhuss removed the backport/pr A backport PR which is target to a release branch. label Apr 20, 2020
coryrc pushed a commit to coryrc/client that referenced this pull request May 14, 2020
@chaodaiG @knative-prow-robot
rename skip-istio flag to skip-istio-addon to make it more obvious (k…
3b83fe7 
…native#739)

* rename skip-istio flag to skip-istio-addon to make it more obvious

* Update scripts/README.md

Co-Authored-By: chaodaiG <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@mattmoor mattmoor mattmoor left review comments

@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot left review comments

@maximilien maximilien maximilien approved these changes

@evankanderson evankanderson Awaiting requested review from evankanderson

@sixolet sixolet Awaiting requested review from sixolet

Assignees

@maximilien maximilien

Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CLA. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
8 participants
@itsmurugappan @maximilien @knative-metrics-robot @knative-prow-robot @mattmoor @rhuss @navidshaikh @googlebot