Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Kaggle Ames xgboost #27

Closed
wants to merge 187 commits into from
Closed

Kaggle Ames xgboost #27

wants to merge 187 commits into from

Conversation

puneith
Copy link
Contributor

@puneith puneith commented Mar 2, 2018

Moved the PR kubeflow/kubeflow#163 to here. Work in progress, DO NOT REVIEW.

Related to #16


This change is Reviewable

jlewi and others added 30 commits February 1, 2018 13:13
Added mercari Kaggle competition entry
added example
Added Airbnb example
Added Airbnb Kaggle link
Add GitHub issue summarization example
edit license badge out
Adding TOC
Adding end-to-end example sequence to sequence learning per request from Jeremy Lewi
Move GitHub issue summarization example into a third_party folder since
it is not Apache 2 licensed.
Add LICENSE file from original repo:
  (https://github.com/hamelsmu/Seq2Seq_Tutorial)
Remove redundancy in folder name
Copy link
Contributor Author

@puneith puneith left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think if we leave the local serving (which works) and (currently broken GKE serving), and merge PR. Then do the fix in follow-up PR that will give folks to try out the XGBoost example which does indeed work (modulo GKE). I personally don't find it a terrible thing to do unless folks think otherwise.

Reviewable status: 0 of 9 files reviewed, 22 unresolved discussions (waiting on @ankushagarwal, @texasmichelle, @jlewi, and @puneith)


xgboost/README.md, line 54 at r23 (raw file):

Previously, texasmichelle (Michelle Casbon) wrote…

Insert "by running" before docker images.

Done.


xgboost/README.md, line 62 at r23 (raw file):

Previously, texasmichelle (Michelle Casbon) wrote…

s/One/A/

Done.


xgboost/README.md, line 66 at r23 (raw file):

Previously, texasmichelle (Michelle Casbon) wrote…

This link is broken

Done.


xgboost/README.md, line 69 at r23 (raw file):

Previously, texasmichelle (Michelle Casbon) wrote…

Formatting issue - these are collapsed into a single line

Done.


xgboost/README.md, line 81 at r23 (raw file):

Previously, texasmichelle (Michelle Casbon) wrote…

Same formatting issue

Done.


xgboost/README.md, line 87 at r23 (raw file):

Previously, texasmichelle (Michelle Casbon) wrote…

sp *Persistent

Done.


xgboost/README.md, line 90 at r23 (raw file):

Previously, texasmichelle (Michelle Casbon) wrote…

s/at/to the/

Done.


xgboost/README.md, line 151 at r23 (raw file):

Previously, texasmichelle (Michelle Casbon) wrote…

There are several places where users are instructed to setup a GKE cluster, which is redundant. Let’s move them into the Prerequisites section, as well as Kubeflow Setup, so that it is all in one place.

Done.


xgboost/README.md, line 153 at r23 (raw file):

Previously, texasmichelle (Michelle Casbon) wrote…

s/minikube Kubernetes/GKE/
Insert "in the Deploy Seldon Core section" before [here].

Done.


xgboost/README.md, line 167 at r23 (raw file):

Previously, texasmichelle (Michelle Casbon) wrote…

sp *Deploy

Done.


xgboost/README.md, line 180 at r23 (raw file):

Previously, texasmichelle (Michelle Casbon) wrote…

sp *its

I must have been writing this in my sleep, thx! :) done


xgboost/README.md, line 187 at r23 (raw file):

Previously, texasmichelle (Michelle Casbon) wrote…

You're port forwarding 8080, then curling on 5000.

Done.

@puneith
Copy link
Contributor Author

puneith commented Aug 20, 2018

@texasmichelle @jlewi responded to comments.

@texasmichelle
Copy link
Member

/retest all

@texasmichelle
Copy link
Member

Agreed - let's merge what we have & create an issue for resolving the GKE approach.

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: texasmichelle

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@texasmichelle
Copy link
Member

@puneith Can you look into these merge blockers?

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

@puneith
Copy link
Contributor Author

puneith commented Aug 21, 2018

@texasmichelle hmm I didn't close the PR how did it do that? And now I can't reopen it.

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@puneith: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun them all:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
kubeflow-examples-presubmit 885dbb0 link /test kubeflow-examples-presubmit

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants