Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "pkg/plugin/v3: use repo instead of directory basename as project name" #1597

Conversation

camilamacedo86
Copy link
Member

@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 commented Jul 16, 2020

Reverts #1596

Important: My goal is not to move forward with. just check if others are also ok with.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jul 16, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: camilamacedo86

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Jul 16, 2020
@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Member Author

camilamacedo86 commented Jul 16, 2020

Hi @estroz,

The #1596 was merged without a second opinion. In this way, since was raised a concern on it, I raised the revert just or we check if others are ok or not with and if we should or not revert the change.

@pwittrock @DirectXMan12 are you. ok with the changes made in #1596? If yes, I think we can close this one. If not. then IMO we should move with and start a new discussion.

c/c @estroz @joelanford

@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-kubebuilder-e2e-k8s-1-16-2

@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Member Author

/hold

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jul 16, 2020
@pwittrock
Copy link
Contributor

@camilamacedo86 Lets hold this for discussion.

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@camilamacedo86: PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jul 23, 2020
@estroz
Copy link
Contributor

estroz commented Jul 23, 2020

Closed by #1603

/close

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@estroz: Closed this PR.

In response to this:

Closed by #1603

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 deleted the revert-1596-bugfix/use-repo-project-name branch July 23, 2020 19:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants