Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

⚠️ remove component config since it is no longer supported by controller-runtime and is deprecated #3764

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 15, 2024
Merged

⚠️ remove component config since it is no longer supported by controller-runtime and is deprecated #3764

merged 1 commit into from
May 15, 2024

Conversation

camilamacedo86
Copy link
Member

@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 commented Jan 30, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Description

The ComponentConfig has been deprecated in the Controller-Runtime since its version 0.15.0. More info
Moreover, it has undergone breaking changes and is no longer functioning as intended.
As a result, Kubebuilder, which heavily relies on the Controller Runtime, has also deprecated this feature,
no longer guaranteeing its functionality from version 3.11.0 onwards. You can find additional details on this issue [here](kubernetes-sigs/controller-runtime#2370

More info: #3469

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Jan 30, 2024
@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 removed the request for review from rashmigottipati January 30, 2024 16:32
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jan 30, 2024
@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 changed the title ⚠️ remove component config since it is no longer supported by controller-runtime and is deprecated WIP ⚠️ remove component config since it is no longer supported by controller-runtime and is deprecated Jan 30, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jan 30, 2024
@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 force-pushed the remove-component-config branch 3 times, most recently from e215657 to e3fd2c1 Compare January 30, 2024 16:55
@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 changed the title WIP ⚠️ remove component config since it is no longer supported by controller-runtime and is deprecated ⚠️ remove component config since it is no longer supported by controller-runtime and is deprecated Jan 30, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jan 30, 2024
@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Member Author

/hold

To allow reviews

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 30, 2024
varshaprasad96
varshaprasad96 approved these changes Jan 30, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@varshaprasad96 varshaprasad96 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the PR, @camilamacedo86!

I did a quick search for ComponentConfig locally from your branch, and looks like this PR removes it all :))

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 30, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: camilamacedo86, varshaprasad96

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [camilamacedo86,varshaprasad96]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Member Author

/hold cancel

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 30, 2024
@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Member Author

I will wait up next week for we get those merged

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jan 31, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 30, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Mar 30, 2024
@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Mar 30, 2024
@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Member Author

/easycla

@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-kubebuilder-e2e-k8s-1-29-0

/test pull-kubebuilder-e2e-k8s-1-26-6

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Apr 1, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Apr 6, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

k8s-ci-robot commented Apr 6, 2024 •
edited
Loading

@camilamacedo86: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
pull-kubebuilder-e2e-k8s-1-29-0 3a7771d link true /test pull-kubebuilder-e2e-k8s-1-29-0

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Apr 9, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. and removed needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. labels May 15, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label May 15, 2024
@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Member Author

/overwrite APIDiff

@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Member Author

/override APIDiff

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@camilamacedo86: /override requires failed status contexts, check run or a prowjob name to operate on.
The following unknown contexts/checkruns were given:

  • APIDiff

Only the following failed contexts/checkruns were expected:

  • EasyCLA
  • netlify/kubebuilder/deploy-preview
  • pull-kubebuilder-e2e-k8s-1-27-11
  • pull-kubebuilder-e2e-k8s-1-28-7
  • pull-kubebuilder-e2e-k8s-1-29-2
  • pull-kubebuilder-test
  • tide

If you are trying to override a checkrun that has a space in it, you must put a double quote on the context.

In response to this:

/override APIDiff

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 merged commit ce113d2 into kubernetes-sigs:master May 15, 2024
16 of 18 checks passed
@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 deleted the remove-component-config branch May 15, 2024 20:14
@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 mentioned this pull request May 18, 2024
Closed
@Neo2308 Neo2308 mentioned this pull request Jun 18, 2024
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@varshaprasad96 varshaprasad96 varshaprasad96 approved these changes

@everettraven everettraven Awaiting requested review from everettraven

Assignees

@varshaprasad96 varshaprasad96

Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@camilamacedo86 @k8s-ci-robot @varshaprasad96