Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: disable auth access logs #9049

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 8, 2023

Conversation

johanneswuerbach
Copy link
Contributor

@johanneswuerbach johanneswuerbach commented Sep 12, 2022

What this PR does / why we need it:

Currently nginx logs requests twice when external authentication is enabled, which is fairly confusing as the $request and $upstream_addr etc. are the same, but only $bytes_sent and $request_length are 0 and the $status_code might be different.

While this logging could be made conditional, I wonder in which use-case both logs would be expected looking at the fact that the logged information is kind of broken.

The main benefit seems to be that the $status_code of the auth response is visible in the first log line and not in the second, but I wonder whether this justifies the cost of logging every request with all details twice (troubleshooting request details seems more like a job for tracing).

Related #3040

At the moment we use:

controller:
  config:
    ...
    http-snippet: |
      map $uri $loggable {
          volatile;
          "~^\/_external-auth.*" 0;
          default 1;
      }

To disable logs for external auth requests.

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • CVE Report (Scanner found CVE and adding report)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation only

Which issue/s this PR fixes

How Has This Been Tested?

Manually.

Checklist:

  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I've read the CONTRIBUTION guide
  • I have added unit and/or e2e tests to cover my changes.
  • All new and existing tests passed.
  • Added Release Notes.

Does my pull request need a release note?

Any user-visible or operator-visible change qualifies for a release note. This could be a:

  • CLI change
  • API change
  • UI change
  • configuration schema change
  • behavioral change
  • change in non-functional attributes such as efficiency or availability, availability of a new platform
  • a warning about a deprecation
  • fix of a previous Known Issue
  • fix of a vulnerability (CVE)

No release notes are required for changes to the following:

  • Tests
  • Build infrastructure
  • Fixes for unreleased bugs

For more tips on writing good release notes, check out the Release Notes Handbook

Fixed: Requests with external auth enabled are only logged once.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. labels Sep 12, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@johanneswuerbach: This issue is currently awaiting triage.

If Ingress contributors determines this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the triage/accepted label and provide further guidance.

The triage/accepted label can be added by org members by writing /triage accepted in a comment.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @johanneswuerbach!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes/ingress-nginx 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes/ingress-nginx has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @johanneswuerbach. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-kind Indicates a PR lacks a `kind/foo` label and requires one. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. needs-priority size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Sep 12, 2022
@johanneswuerbach johanneswuerbach marked this pull request as ready for review September 13, 2022 07:19
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Sep 13, 2022
@johanneswuerbach
Copy link
Contributor Author

/assign @rikatz

@rikatz
Copy link
Contributor

rikatz commented Jan 8, 2023

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Jan 8, 2023
@rikatz
Copy link
Contributor

rikatz commented Jan 8, 2023

/lgtm
/approve
Thanks

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 8, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: johanneswuerbach, rikatz

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 8, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 424cc86 into kubernetes:main Jan 8, 2023
@gevaeshcoli-microsoft
Copy link

gevaeshcoli-microsoft commented May 3, 2023

Hi johanneswuerbach,

In case we do want to log this access logs - how can we do it?(is there a configuration that we can use?)

Thanks.

@johanneswuerbach
Copy link
Contributor Author

Could you elaborate which details you want to log in your case?

@gevaeshcoli-microsoft
Copy link

gevaeshcoli-microsoft commented May 3, 2023

If I understand you correctly - this PR will eliminate the extra auth calls access logs.

I want to understand if:

  1. can I use another access log property of the original access log to understand what happened in the auth request flow?(performance/status)
  2. can I set a config property to keep the current behavior?

The use case is tracking the auth flow - performance and status.

@johanneswuerbach
Copy link
Contributor Author

This is currently not configurable, but it might be possible to includes those details in your logs using a snippet:

nginx.ingress.kubernetes.io/configuration-snippet: |
  auth_request_set $auth_status $upstream_status;
  auth_request_set $auth_response_time $upstream_response_time;

Afterwards you should be able to include $auth_status and $auth_response_time in your log format.

@marcelocyreno
Copy link
Contributor

marcelocyreno commented Aug 24, 2023

@gevaeshcoli-microsoft, @rikatz : PTAL #10335

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-kind Indicates a PR lacks a `kind/foo` label and requires one. needs-priority needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants