Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add __cpp_lib_concepts guard for __cpp_lib_move_iterator_concept #2994

Merged

Conversation

StephanTLavavej
Copy link
Member

@StephanTLavavej StephanTLavavej commented Aug 3, 2022

🛠️ Fix

🧹 Cleanups

@StephanTLavavej StephanTLavavej added the enhancement Something can be improved label Aug 3, 2022
@StephanTLavavej StephanTLavavej requested a review from a team as a code owner August 3, 2022 23:51
Only the actual definition and test for `__cpp_lib_concepts` still mention `__EDG__` to avoid circularity.

In `P0980R1_constexpr_strings`, explain how the `equalRanges` workaround should be removed.
Cite GH 395 by `__cpp_lib_algorithm_iterator_requirements`.
Copy link
Member

@CaseyCarter CaseyCarter left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for crushing this inconsistency (and apologies for scope creeping your ~10 line PR).

@StephanTLavavej StephanTLavavej self-assigned this Aug 5, 2022
@StephanTLavavej
Copy link
Member Author

I'm mirroring this to the MSVC-internal repo - please notify me if any further changes are pushed.

@StephanTLavavej StephanTLavavej merged commit b52e35b into microsoft:main Aug 5, 2022
@StephanTLavavej StephanTLavavej deleted the move_iterator_concept branch August 5, 2022 23:49
strega-nil pushed a commit to strega-nil/stl that referenced this pull request Aug 6, 2022
fsb4000 pushed a commit to fsb4000/STL that referenced this pull request Aug 13, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement Something can be improved
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants