Cybereason

[FlorianBracq]

Answers #305 but requires #285 and #291 to work as expected.

[petebryan]

Test should pass once #291 merged in. Will do that and confirm.

[petebryan]

@FlorianBracq one additional thing, could we ask that you please add a short documentation page under docs/source/data_acquisiton. Just something very short to show users how to access the use the provider.

[petebryan]

Thanks for the docs @FlorianBracq - looks like you have an issue with the Cybereason tests. It looks like the mocked data in the test has this format:
"elementValues": {
"users": {
"totalValues": 5,
"elementValues": [],
"totalSuspicious": 0,
"totalMalicious": 0,
"guessedTotal": 0,
}
But the driver looks for a "values" key in there. Not sure if this is a mocked data or a driver issue here.

[FlorianBracq]

Thanks for the docs @FlorianBracq - looks like you have an issue with the Cybereason tests. It looks like the mocked data in the test has this format: "elementValues": { "users": { "totalValues": 5, "elementValues": [], "totalSuspicious": 0, "totalMalicious": 0, "guessedTotal": 0, } But the driver looks for a "values" key in there. Not sure if this is a mocked data or a driver issue here.

@petebryan: that was a PEBKAC ;)