Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use nil evaluation state if there is no previous evaluation #4197

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 19, 2024

Conversation

dmjb
Copy link
Contributor

@dmjb dmjb commented Aug 19, 2024

The rule engine has a copy of the previous evaluation state as part of its context. Prior to this PR, if there is no previous state for a rule/entity pair, an empty struct would be passed around. This requires each part of the code which uses the previous state (particularly remediations and alerts) to test if the fields in the state struct are the default value. This problem was highlighted in PR #4089 when the types of some the fields changed, requiring the code to be changed to have different default checks.

This PR changes the logic so that a nil pointer is returned if there is no existing state. This makes the check for a lack of previous state to be consistent irrespective of the fields needed or their type.

Summary

Provide a brief overview of the changes and the issue being addressed.
Explain the rationale and any background necessary for understanding the changes.
List dependencies required by this change, if any.

Fixes #(related issue)

Change Type

Mark the type of change your PR introduces:

  • Bug fix (resolves an issue without affecting existing features)
  • Feature (adds new functionality without breaking changes)
  • Breaking change (may impact existing functionalities or require documentation updates)
  • Documentation (updates or additions to documentation)
  • Refactoring or test improvements (no bug fixes or new functionality)

Testing

Outline how the changes were tested, including steps to reproduce and any relevant configurations.
Attach screenshots if helpful.

Review Checklist:

  • Reviewed my own code for quality and clarity.
  • Added comments to complex or tricky code sections.
  • Updated any affected documentation.
  • Included tests that validate the fix or feature.
  • Checked that related changes are merged.

The rule engine has a copy of the previous evaluation state as part of
its context. Prior to this PR, if there is no previous state for a
rule/entity pair, an empty struct would be passed around. This requires
each part of the code which uses the previous state (particularly
remediations and alerts) to test if the fields in the state struct are
the default value. This problem was highlighted in PR #4089 when the
types of some the fields changed, requiring the code to be changed to
have different default checks.

This PR changes the logic so that a nil pointer is returned if there is
no existing state. This makes the check for a lack of previous state to
be consistent irrespective of the fields needed or their type.

Validated with unit tests locally.
@dmjb dmjb requested a review from a team as a code owner August 19, 2024 10:24
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

coverage: 53.872% (-0.03%) from 53.899%
when pulling e5ace3b on previous-status-nil
into 02a42be on main.

@dmjb dmjb merged commit bf3ccbf into main Aug 19, 2024
25 of 26 checks passed
@dmjb dmjb deleted the previous-status-nil branch August 19, 2024 12:48
@dmjb dmjb mentioned this pull request Aug 19, 2024
10 tasks
dmjb added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 19, 2024
Out of the three commits which were reverted, one of them was replaced by #4197 which solves the problem at source. This will reapply the other two. Some changes were made to fit with the changes introduced by #4197

Validated against smoke tests by @rdimitrov. I also ran the failing smoke tests against this branch locally.

* Change profile/rule status queries to use evaluation history table (#4089)

This change allows most of the functionality which previously used the
`rule_evaluations` (and related) tables to use the new evaluation
history tables instead.

* Fix issue with Alert URLs for pull requests and artifacts (#4183)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants