Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add comparison signals for DynamicPipeEnergyConservationCheck / DynamicPipeEnergyConservationCheck2 #4425

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 22, 2024

Conversation

casella
Copy link
Contributor

@casella casella commented Jun 18, 2024

Added missing comparison signals for DynamicPipeEnergyConservationCheck and DynamicPipeEnergyConservationCheck2. Since the goal of the model is to check energy balance by comparing boundary enthalpies, I only added those values to the comparison signals.

Contributes resolving #4349.

Copy link
Contributor

@maltelenz maltelenz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can at least confirm that the models do contain all listed variables.

@beutlich beutlich changed the title Added comparison signals for DynamicPipeEnergyConservationCheck Added comparison signals for DynamicPipeEnergyConservationCheck / DynamicPipeEnergyConservationCheck2 Jun 19, 2024
@casella casella merged commit 08f2045 into modelica:master Jun 22, 2024
2 checks passed
@casella casella modified the milestones: MSL4.1.0, MSL4.2.0 Jun 28, 2024
@beutlich beutlich removed the request for review from AHaumer July 19, 2024 19:24
@beutlich beutlich changed the title Added comparison signals for DynamicPipeEnergyConservationCheck / DynamicPipeEnergyConservationCheck2 Adde comparison signals for DynamicPipeEnergyConservationCheck / DynamicPipeEnergyConservationCheck2 Jul 19, 2024
@beutlich beutlich changed the title Adde comparison signals for DynamicPipeEnergyConservationCheck / DynamicPipeEnergyConservationCheck2 Add comparison signals for DynamicPipeEnergyConservationCheck / DynamicPipeEnergyConservationCheck2 Jul 19, 2024
@Esther-Devakirubai
Copy link
Contributor

@casella Can this be backported to Maint/4.1.0?

@casella
Copy link
Contributor Author

casella commented Jul 31, 2024

@casella Can this be backported to Maint/4.1.0?

Please do and report in #4349. Thanks!

@Esther-Devakirubai
Copy link
Contributor

Backporting this to maintenance branch by #4450

@beutlich beutlich modified the milestones: MSL4.2.0, maintenance Aug 16, 2024
beutlich pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 17, 2024
@beutlich beutlich added the L: ModelicaTest Issue addresses ModelicaTest, ModelicaTestConversion4 or ModelicaTestOverdetermined label Aug 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
L: ModelicaTest Issue addresses ModelicaTest, ModelicaTestConversion4 or ModelicaTestOverdetermined
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants