-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 651
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
NotImplementedError: Groupby with lists of columns not yet supported. #75
Labels
new feature/request 💬
Requests and pull requests for new features
Milestone
Comments
devin-petersohn
added
the
new feature/request 💬
Requests and pull requests for new features
label
Aug 30, 2018
Hi @mathlf2015, thanks for the request. We are currently rewriting the majority of the backend for scalability, performance, and maintainability. With this update, |
thank you for your reply. |
devin-petersohn
referenced
this issue
in devin-petersohn/modin
Jan 13, 2020
* Resolves #75 * Adds support for grouping by multiple columns. * Does this grouping by broadcasting the columns. * A preliminary performance evaluation shows that it is significantly faster than before, but still has some room for improvement. * Minimal code changes to add this new feature. * We still default to pandas when the user is looping over the dataframe * Even though this is common, it is exceptionally hard to optimize, and out of scope for this PR.
3 tasks
devin-petersohn
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 13, 2020
* Resolves #75 * Adds support for grouping by multiple columns. * Does this grouping by broadcasting the columns. * A preliminary performance evaluation shows that it is significantly faster than before, but still has some room for improvement. * Minimal code changes to add this new feature. * We still default to pandas when the user is looping over the dataframe * Even though this is common, it is exceptionally hard to optimize, and out of scope for this PR.
dchigarev
pushed a commit
to dchigarev/modin
that referenced
this issue
Aug 25, 2020
REFACTOR-modin-project#1879: Move logic for `groupby.agg` into query compiler
vnlitvinov
pushed a commit
to vnlitvinov/modin
that referenced
this issue
Feb 27, 2023
…roject#75) [core] Note for upstream and rebase: Don't worry about the client query compiler change here as it's just deleting an unused method. Don't need to upstream or add into the next modin branch on the next rebase. Signed-off-by: mvashishtha <[email protected]>
vnlitvinov
pushed a commit
to vnlitvinov/modin
that referenced
this issue
Feb 27, 2023
…roject#75) [service] Note for upstream and rebase: Don't worry about the client query compiler change here as it's just deleting an unused method. Don't need to upstream or add into the next modin branch on the next rebase. Signed-off-by: mvashishtha <[email protected]>
mvashishtha
added a commit
to mvashishtha/modin
that referenced
this issue
Feb 27, 2023
…roject#75) Note for upstream and rebase: Don't worry about the client query compiler change here as it's just deleting an unused method. Don't need to upstream or add into the next modin branch on the next rebase. Signed-off-by: mvashishtha <[email protected]>
vnlitvinov
pushed a commit
to vnlitvinov/modin
that referenced
this issue
Mar 16, 2023
…roject#75) [core] Note for upstream and rebase: Don't worry about the client query compiler change here as it's just deleting an unused method. Don't need to upstream or add into the next modin branch on the next rebase. Signed-off-by: mvashishtha <[email protected]>
vnlitvinov
pushed a commit
to vnlitvinov/modin
that referenced
this issue
Mar 16, 2023
…roject#75) [service] Note for upstream and rebase: Don't worry about the client query compiler change here as it's just deleting an unused method. Don't need to upstream or add into the next modin branch on the next rebase. Signed-off-by: mvashishtha <[email protected]>
vnlitvinov
pushed a commit
to vnlitvinov/modin
that referenced
this issue
Mar 16, 2023
…roject#75) [core] Note for upstream and rebase: Don't worry about the client query compiler change here as it's just deleting an unused method. Don't need to upstream or add into the next modin branch on the next rebase. Signed-off-by: mvashishtha <[email protected]>
vnlitvinov
pushed a commit
to vnlitvinov/modin
that referenced
this issue
Mar 16, 2023
…roject#75) [service] Note for upstream and rebase: Don't worry about the client query compiler change here as it's just deleting an unused method. Don't need to upstream or add into the next modin branch on the next rebase. Signed-off-by: mvashishtha <[email protected]>
vnlitvinov
pushed a commit
to vnlitvinov/modin
that referenced
this issue
Mar 16, 2023
…roject#75) [core] Note for upstream and rebase: Don't worry about the client query compiler change here as it's just deleting an unused method. Don't need to upstream or add into the next modin branch on the next rebase. Signed-off-by: mvashishtha <[email protected]>
vnlitvinov
pushed a commit
to vnlitvinov/modin
that referenced
this issue
Mar 16, 2023
…roject#75) [service] Note for upstream and rebase: Don't worry about the client query compiler change here as it's just deleting an unused method. Don't need to upstream or add into the next modin branch on the next rebase. Signed-off-by: mvashishtha <[email protected]>
vnlitvinov
pushed a commit
to vnlitvinov/modin
that referenced
this issue
Mar 16, 2023
…roject#75) [core] Note for upstream and rebase: Don't worry about the client query compiler change here as it's just deleting an unused method. Don't need to upstream or add into the next modin branch on the next rebase. Signed-off-by: mvashishtha <[email protected]>
vnlitvinov
pushed a commit
to vnlitvinov/modin
that referenced
this issue
Mar 16, 2023
…roject#75) [service] Note for upstream and rebase: Don't worry about the client query compiler change here as it's just deleting an unused method. Don't need to upstream or add into the next modin branch on the next rebase. Signed-off-by: mvashishtha <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
System information
0.1.1
Describe the problem
Groupby with lists of columns not yet supported.
Source code / logs
Waiting for redis server at 127.0.0.1:59835 to respond...
Waiting for redis server at 127.0.0.1:16671 to respond...
Starting local scheduler with the following resources: {'CPU': 56, 'GPU': 4}.
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "gen_fea_online.py", line 318, in
df = get_data_log_hive(pre_time=(2018,8,7))
File "gen_fea_online.py", line 290, in get_data_log_hive
df_vod40 = gen_fea_active_log(df_vod40)
File "gen_fea_online.py", line 238, in gen_fea_active_log
t1 = t1.groupby(["subid","label"])["cnt"].count().reset_index()
File "/root/anaconda3/lib/python3.6/site-packages/modin/pandas/dataframe.py", line 823, in groupby
"Groupby with lists of columns not yet supported.")
NotImplementedError: Groupby with lists of columns not yet supported.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: