feat: replace pr title validator

[Xunzhuo]

Signed-off-by: Xunzhuo [email protected]

resolve: #485

What this PR does:

replace pr title validator

compared with thehanimo/pr-title-checker:

amannn/action-semantic-pull-request is an ideal workflow to check PR Validation, it is followed by semantic style, as for thehanimo/pr-title-checker, we need to write the pattern in json config, and actually thery are not followed by semantic style tyle, and we have to maintain another json config, which is no-needed.

Also this project is more active than hehanimo/pr-title-checker, which means this project is more stable to be maintained. We should choose a stable and active action as our github workflow, otherwise if any bugs happened, we will get into troubles and hard for us to fix, which leads us to change our actions repeatedly, this is not what maintainers want to see.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #526 (e1f6a3f) into main (309ed3a) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

❗ Current head e1f6a3f differs from pull request most recent head 22d8327. Consider uploading reports for the commit 22d8327 to get more accurate results

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #526   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   60.92%   60.92%           
=======================================
  Files         120      120           
  Lines        6377     6377           
=======================================
  Hits         3885     3885           
  Misses       2120     2120           
  Partials      372      372           

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update e9353e5...22d8327. Read the comment docs.

[Xunzhuo]

we need give new action: amannn/action-semantic-pull-request privilege to access resource:

[seeflood]

@ZLBer Any idea on this PR?

[seeflood]

@Xunzhuo Hi, why close it?
I can help authorize the action

[seeflood]

lgtm

[seeflood]

@Xunzhuo Hi, as a poor reader, I didn't find out how to grant access to the TOKEN after reading the doc 😭
Does the action automatically get permission after being merged?