-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 72
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
please update the readme to avoid confusion #6
Comments
+1 - is it possible to get an update on this? |
I would suggest to update the description - e.g. |
fhinkel
added a commit
to fhinkel/node-v8
that referenced
this issue
Jul 25, 2017
We want to make sure nobody confuses this repo with the main repo. Ref: nodejs#6
fhinkel
added a commit
to fhinkel/node-v8
that referenced
this issue
Jul 25, 2017
We want to make sure nobody confuses this repo with the main repo. Ref: nodejs#6
fhinkel
added a commit
to fhinkel/node-v8
that referenced
this issue
Jul 25, 2017
We want to make sure nobody confuses this repo with the main repo. Ref: nodejs#6
fhinkel
added a commit
to fhinkel/node-v8
that referenced
this issue
Aug 1, 2017
We want to make sure nobody confuses this repo with the main repo. Ref: nodejs#6
targos
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 3, 2017
We want to make sure nobody confuses this repo with the main repo. Ref: #6
I also changed the description to "Experimental Node.js mirror on V8 Tip-of-Tree" |
nodejs-ci
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 27, 2017
Currently when running the test without an internet connection there are two JavaScript test failures and one cctest. The cctest only fails on Mac as far as I know. (I've only tested using Mac and Linux thus far). This commit moves the two JavaScript tests to test/internet. The details for test_inspector_socket_server.cc: [ RUN ] InspectorSocketServerTest.FailsToBindToNodejsHost make[1]: *** [cctest] Segmentation fault: 11 make: *** [test] Error 2 lldb output: [ RUN ] InspectorSocketServerTest.FailsToBindToNodejsHost Process 63058 stopped * thread #1: tid = 0x7b175, 0x00007fff96d04384 * libsystem_info.dylib`_gai_simple + 87, queue = * 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = EXC_BAD_ACCESS (code=1, * address=0x0) frame #0: 0x00007fff96d04384 libsystem_info.dylib`_gai_simple + 87 libsystem_info.dylib`_gai_simple: -> 0x7fff96d04384 <+87>: movw (%rdx), %ax 0x7fff96d04387 <+90>: movw %ax, -0x2a(%rbp) 0x7fff96d0438b <+94>: movq %r13, -0x38(%rbp) 0x7fff96d0438f <+98>: movq 0x18(%rbp), %rcx (lldb) bt * thread #1: tid = 0x7b175, 0x00007fff96d04384 * libsystem_info.dylib`_gai_simple + 87, queue = * 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = EXC_BAD_ACCESS (code=1, * address=0x0) * frame #0: 0x00007fff96d04384 libsystem_info.dylib`_gai_simple + 87 frame #1: 0x00007fff96cfe98b libsystem_info.dylib`search_addrinfo + 179 frame #2: 0x00007fff96cfafef libsystem_info.dylib`si_addrinfo + 2255 frame #3: 0x00007fff96cfa67b libsystem_info.dylib`getaddrinfo + 179 frame #4: 0x00000001017d8888 cctest`uv__getaddrinfo_work(w=0x00007fff5fbfe210) + 72 at getaddrinfo.c:102 frame #5: 0x00000001017d880e cctest`uv_getaddrinfo(loop=0x000000010287cb80, req=0x00007fff5fbfe1c8, cb=0x0000000000000000, hostname="nodejs.org", service="0", hints=0x00007fff5fbfe268) + 734 at getaddrinfo.c:192 frame #6: 0x000000010171f781 cctest`node::inspector::InspectorSocketServer::Start(this=0x00007fff5fbfe658) + 801 at inspector_socket_server.cc:398 frame #7: 0x00000001016ed590 cctest`InspectorSocketServerTest_FailsToBindToNodejsHost_Test::TestBody(this=0x0000000105001fd0) + 288 at test_inspector_socket_server.cc:593 I'm not sure about the exact cause for this but when using a standalone c program to simulate this it seems like when the ai_flags `AI_NUMERICSERV` is set, which is done in inspector_socket_server.cc line 394, the servname (the port in the FailsToBindToNodejsHost test) is expected to be a numeric port string to avoid looking it up in /etc/services. When the port is 0 as is it was before this commit the segment fault occurs but not if it is non-zero. PR-URL: nodejs/node#16255 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Someone I know was somewhat confused if this was the main node repo or not, we should probably either patch the readme, or be much more clear in the repo name + description.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: