-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Github Subteams #13675
Comments
This definitely could be quite useful. Do you happen to know if at-mentioning the parent team notifies the child teams? Are the members of the child teams shown as members of the parent also? (I guess I could go experiment with that myself ;-) ... just wondered if you already knew) |
I just heard about it from @gdams , haven't tried it myself either. |
From the docs :-)
This definitely looks compelling. Will have to experiment with this a bit. |
To kick off the experiment, I have made the @nodejs/backporting team a child of the @nodejs/lts team. Let's see how that goes. |
I've gone through and organized a few of the teams into logical groups. @nodejs/build ... if anyone can verify that changes to the hierarchy has no impact on any external permissions we have configured (e.g. jenkins access), then I can make a few more organizational changes that would definitely clean things up. |
@jasnell Just so you know, I think that accidentally (?) added me to @nodejs/lts … not that I care much, but it’s something we might want to be aware of. edit: see @jasnell’s answer below for why it appears that way |
@addaleax are you sure? You attended some LTS meetings, you may be there because of that. I can't find the teams to verify, maybe clutzy, maybe becaue I lack perms. |
So, from the documentation and what I've been able to gather, making the Backporting team a child of LTS means that any at-mentions for @nodejs/lts will also notify @nodejs/backporting, and the members of the @nodejs/backporting team will be displayed as members of @nodejs/lts. Also, any repo permissions granted to the parent are applied to the child, but not vice-versa. In other words, it is possible to grant repo permissions to a child that are not propagated up to the parent. |
Did anyone notice that you can't directly mention a member of a child team? |
I'm not understanding what you mean. You can do @nodejs/lts (parent) and @nodejs/backporting (child), or @mention one of them (e.g. @jasnell). |
I've contacted GitHub support and that seems to be an issue that they are aware and trying to fix it. In the case you describe you probably can mention @jasnell because he's an admin or a member of the parent team. The bug can be found if you're using a structure like Team A > Team B > Team C, give permissions only to Team A and then trying to mention a member of the Team B or Team C (This user cannot be member of Team A) |
I thought from @jasnell's comment #13675 (comment) that people who were in the child team were automatically in the main team. For example @addaleax doesn't show up in @nodejs/lts, but she does in @nodejs/backporting. |
Just a small note: i don't know how the jenkins auth plugin will handle this, but I'm guessing it acts strictly on name - so if we are to rename things make sure we sync this with @nodejs/jenkins-admins. |
Discussion has run its course, and we're already using subteams in the org, so closing. |
Github now supports setting parents for teams. This seems like something that might be useful for us, e.g. the @nodejs/lts @nodejs/release WG issues (nodejs/Release#223).
Github docs link
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: