Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bootstrap: do not generate code cache in an unfinalized isolate #49108

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 17, 2023

Conversation

joyeecheung
Copy link
Member

V8 now no longer supports serializing code cache in an isolate with unfinalized read-only space. So guard the code cache regeneration with the is_building_snapshot() flag. When the isolate is created for snapshot generation, the code cache is going to be serialized separately anyway, so there is no need to do it in the builtin loader.

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Review requested:

  • @nodejs/startup

@joyeecheung joyeecheung marked this pull request as ready for review August 11, 2023 14:31
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. labels Aug 11, 2023
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@joyeecheung joyeecheung added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Aug 15, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Aug 15, 2023
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

V8 now no longer supports serializing code cache in an isolate
with unfinalized read-only space. So guard the code cache regeneration
with the `is_building_snapshot()` flag. When the isolate is created
for snapshot generation, the code cache is going to be serialized
separately anyway, so there is no need to do it in the builtin loader.
@joyeecheung
Copy link
Member Author

Rebased because the GitHub CI doesn't rebase to pick up #49110...

@joyeecheung joyeecheung added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Aug 15, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Aug 15, 2023
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@joyeecheung joyeecheung added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Aug 15, 2023
@joyeecheung
Copy link
Member Author

Rebased to resolve conflicts..

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Aug 15, 2023
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@joyeecheung joyeecheung added the commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. label Aug 17, 2023
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot removed the commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. label Aug 17, 2023
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot merged commit fe219e0 into nodejs:main Aug 17, 2023
58 checks passed
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Landed in fe219e0

UlisesGascon pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2023
V8 now no longer supports serializing code cache in an isolate
with unfinalized read-only space. So guard the code cache regeneration
with the `is_building_snapshot()` flag. When the isolate is created
for snapshot generation, the code cache is going to be serialized
separately anyway, so there is no need to do it in the builtin loader.

PR-URL: #49108
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <[email protected]>
@UlisesGascon UlisesGascon mentioned this pull request Sep 10, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants