Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(enginenetx): assign InitialDelay when dialing #1555

Merged
merged 113 commits into from
Apr 17, 2024
Merged

Conversation

bassosimone
Copy link
Contributor

@bassosimone bassosimone commented Apr 17, 2024

This diff refactors enginenetx to assign InitialDelay only when dialing. It is pointless to do that before. Also, take advantage of algorithms introduced by #1556 to make the code more compact.

Part of ooni/probe#2704.

This diff refactors the code generating tactics to mix bridge and DNS
tactics, such that we avoid trying all bridge tactics before falling
back to DNS tactics. In the event in which the bridge is IP or endpoint
blocked, this change makes sure we try using DNS tactics earlier, and,
if the DNS is working, this means a faster bootstrap.

Based on testing, where I replaced the bridge address with 10.0.0.1, we
try DNS tactics after 8 seconds. After the first run, if the DNS tactics
are working, we would immediately use them before bridge tactics, since
we store information about tactics inside the $OONI_HOME/engine dir.

Part of ooni/probe#2704.
Previously, we were only testing with DNS returning error, while
now we should also have a test case for when it's working given that
we're mixing tactics together now.

return out
p.maybeRewriteTestHelpersTactics(p.Fallback.LookupTactics(ctx, domain, port)),
)
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Here we're replacing an inline expansion of mixSequentially with a call to mixSequentially.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Additionally, the tx.InitialDelay is gone because we'll compute that once when dialing.

tactic := &httpsDialerTactic{
Address: addr,
InitialDelay: happyEyeballsDelay(idx),
InitialDelay: 0, // set when dialing
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Here we removed computing the happy-eyeballs delay because we're computing it when dialing.

@@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ func (hd *httpsDialer) DialTLSContext(ctx context.Context, network string, endpo

// The emitter will emit tactics and then close the channel when done. We spawn 16 workers
// that handle tactics in parallel and post results on the collector channel.
emitter := hd.policy.LookupTactics(ctx, hostname, port)
emitter := httpsFilterTactics(hd.policy.LookupTactics(ctx, hostname, port))
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is where we're computing the happy eyeballs delay when dialing.

}

// avoid emitting nil tactics and duplicate tactics
return filterOnlyKeepUniqueTactics(filterOutNilTactics(mixSequentially(
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Rather than using maybeEmitTactic here we're using filtering to achieve 2/3 of the original goals, i.e., filtering out nils and only keeping unique tactics. The final original goal, i.e., adding happy-eyeballs delays, is now implemented just once when we're dialing, so there's no point in doing that also here.

@bassosimone bassosimone changed the title Issue/2704c refactor(enginenetx): assign InitialDelay when dialing Apr 17, 2024
@bassosimone bassosimone marked this pull request as ready for review April 17, 2024 12:17
@bassosimone bassosimone merged commit 0d4dc93 into master Apr 17, 2024
26 of 28 checks passed
@bassosimone bassosimone deleted the issue/2704c branch April 17, 2024 12:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant