[chore][internal/filter/filterconfig] Update comment to match functionality #31517
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
atoulme
approved these changes
Mar 9, 2024
atoulme
added
the
ready to merge
codeboten
approved these changes
Mar 12, 2024
DougManton
pushed a commit
to DougManton/opentelemetry-collector-contrib
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 13, 2024
…nality (open-telemetry#31517) Context: open-telemetry#31496 (comment) I believe strict matching was originally the only supported option for attributes, and regex was added shortly after. I believe this comment was missed with the update, so it's out of date. Refer to the referenced comment above for more context and references.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Documentation:
Context: #31496 (comment)
I believe strict matching was originally the only supported option for attributes, and regex was added shortly after. I believe this comment was missed with the update, so it's out of date. Refer to the referenced comment above for more context and references.