Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[exporter/datadogexporter, pkg/datadog, testbed] Use NewDefaultClientConfig instead of manually creating struct #35519

Merged

Conversation

mackjmr
Copy link
Member

@mackjmr mackjmr commented Oct 1, 2024

Description:
This PR makes usage of NewDefaultClientConfig instead of manually creating the confighttp.ClientConfig struct.

Link to tracking Issue: #35457

…ally creating struct

**Description:**
This PR makes usage of `NewDefaultClientConfig` instead of manually creating the confighttp.ClientConfig struct.

**Link to tracking Issue:** open-telemetry#35457
@mackjmr mackjmr changed the title [exporter/datadogexporter] Use NewDefaultClientConfig instead of manually creating struct [exporter/datadogexporter, pkg/datadog, testbed] Use NewDefaultClientConfig instead of manually creating struct Oct 1, 2024
@songy23 songy23 added the Skip Changelog PRs that do not require a CHANGELOG.md entry label Oct 1, 2024
@mx-psi mx-psi merged commit c621e78 into open-telemetry:main Oct 1, 2024
156 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the next release milestone Oct 1, 2024
jriguera pushed a commit to springernature/opentelemetry-collector-contrib that referenced this pull request Oct 4, 2024
…Config instead of manually creating struct (open-telemetry#35519)

**Description:**
This PR makes usage of `NewDefaultClientConfig` instead of manually
creating the confighttp.ClientConfig struct.

**Link to tracking Issue:** open-telemetry#35457
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
exporter/datadog Datadog components pkg/datadog Skip Changelog PRs that do not require a CHANGELOG.md entry testbed
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants