Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Resolve semantic inconsistencies for non traditional messaging #1027
Resolve semantic inconsistencies for non traditional messaging #1027
Changes from 11 commits
d7ced57
c4b7094
697ce0a
362e0c1
f981ac0
a7272ce
9304911
aa657fe
2f442b3
497f8dc
d1143e8
ac664f6
a3d183b
fc461bc
1baeb11
46b1bda
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We have a tombstone filled in the instrumentation currently, is it useful to have here?
https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-java-instrumentation/blob/f23ad29187ecea4e742e1dd6a5baeb84020298d4/instrumentation/kafka-clients-0.11/src/main/java/io/opentelemetry/javaagent/instrumentation/kafkaclients/KafkaProducerTracer.java#L52
If not it's ok and we can remove it from the Instrumentation. But this seems like the right time to get out instrumentation synced up with the spec.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I might also consider separating out a subfolder for messaging implementations as per #968 - there are so many of them that I worry a single doc just gets unwieldy.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No problems with the delay, I appreciate everyone is super busy right now and context switching IS difficult.
I can see it being beneficial to identify if a particular trace is related to a tombstone record. I can add it to the Kafka section.
Can the splitting be done in a subsequent PR, or you'd prefer to include it here as well? I can certainly follow up with such a change.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Splitting in a separate PR sounds great, thanks