Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[DO NOT MERGE] On-Cluster Builds Integration #3849

Conversation

cheesesashimi
Copy link
Member

@cheesesashimi cheesesashimi commented Aug 10, 2023

- What I did

This is an integration of the following PRs:

- How to verify it

One should be able to point clusterbot at this PR to get an OpenShift cluster with an early version of on-cluster builds.

- Description for the changelog

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Aug 10, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 10, 2023

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 10, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: cheesesashimi

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 10, 2023
@cheesesashimi cheesesashimi force-pushed the zzlotnik/on-cluster-builds-integration branch from 8a325e0 to dfe36c9 Compare August 11, 2023 19:28
@cheesesashimi cheesesashimi force-pushed the zzlotnik/on-cluster-builds-integration branch from 018bcfe to 30595ff Compare August 14, 2023 14:55
@cheesesashimi
Copy link
Member Author

/test e2e-aws-ovn
/test e2e-gcp-op

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 14, 2023

@cheesesashimi: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn 30595ff9d39a58305ca359acac0fbd3415c709c3 link true /test e2e-aws-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-op 30595ff9d39a58305ca359acac0fbd3415c709c3 link true /test e2e-gcp-op

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@cheesesashimi cheesesashimi force-pushed the zzlotnik/on-cluster-builds-integration branch from 30595ff to 5e7dd27 Compare August 15, 2023 16:02
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Aug 15, 2023
@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@cheesesashimi cheesesashimi force-pushed the zzlotnik/on-cluster-builds-integration branch from 5e7dd27 to 6346406 Compare August 15, 2023 18:36
@cheesesashimi cheesesashimi deleted the zzlotnik/on-cluster-builds-integration branch March 21, 2024 14:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants