feat: bbs createKey, sign and verify

[berendsliedrecht]

READY FOR REVIEW

Almost every change in this PR will be reverted when support for aries-askar is added, as we can then do all the functionality inside the wallet instead of the AFJ level.

• Adds bls12381g1 and bls12381g2 to indyWallet.createKey
• Adds bls12381g2 to indyWallet.sign
• Adds bls12381g2 to indyWallet.verify
• Store and retrieve the keyPair in the wallet via the public key
• Added tests for the indy wallet

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #684 (e878585) into main (9f04375) will decrease coverage by 0.04%.
The diff coverage is 84.07%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #684      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   86.81%   86.76%   -0.05%     
==========================================
  Files         359      360       +1     
  Lines        7809     7894      +85     
  Branches     1206     1230      +24     
==========================================
+ Hits         6779     6849      +70     
- Misses       1029     1044      +15     
  Partials        1        1              

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
packages/core/src/modules/dids/domain/index.ts	100.00% <ø> (ø)
...odules/dids/domain/key-type/getSignatureKeyBase.ts	100.00% <ø> (ø)
...ges/core/src/modules/dids/domain/key-type/index.ts	100.00% <ø> (ø)
.../src/modules/dids/domain/key-type/keyDidMapping.ts	90.90% <ø> (ø)
packages/core/src/wallet/IndyWallet.ts	69.11% <72.22%> (+0.59%)	⬆️
packages/core/src/crypto/BbsService.ts	91.17% <91.17%> (ø)
packages/core/src/crypto/JwsService.ts	91.66% <100.00%> (+0.75%)	⬆️
packages/core/src/crypto/Key.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
packages/core/src/crypto/index.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
packages/core/src/crypto/multiCodecKey.ts	92.30% <100.00%> (ø)
... and 10 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 9f04375...e878585. Read the comment docs.

[TimoGlastra]

Nice!

[TimoGlastra]

I looked at the W3C PR and there are parts of this PR missing in that PR.

I think we want to merge this into a next branch for now. What do you think? Then the w3c pr can also target the next branch. Don't want to add all these dependencies in 0.2.0 if not used yet. Maybe we'll be able to solve this issue (#730) before 0.3.0 release so users are not required to bundle the react native bbs signatures if they're only using indy credentials for example.

[berendsliedrecht]

I looked at the W3C PR and there are parts of this PR missing in that PR.

I think we want to merge this into a next branch for now. What do you think? Then the w3c pr can also target the next branch. Don't want to add all these dependencies in 0.2.0 if not used yet. Maybe we'll be able to solve this issue (#730) before 0.3.0 release so users are not required to bundle the react native bbs signatures if they're only using indy credentials for example.

I agree with not adding it in before the 0.2.0 release. We can merge it after that release or move it to the next branch. I do not really have a big preference.

[berendsliedrecht]

@TimoGlastra base is now next.