Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fill in details on all citations in datasource description page #177

Closed
4 tasks done
travs opened this issue Jul 6, 2015 · 5 comments
Closed
4 tasks done

Fill in details on all citations in datasource description page #177

travs opened this issue Jul 6, 2015 · 5 comments
Assignees

Comments

@travs
Copy link

travs commented Jul 6, 2015

Raised from Padraig's point here.

We need to make the datasource description page more rigorous, adding things like:

  • citations of original references
  • discussion of labs involved
  • explanation of decisions we made about the datasources
  • Add in citation for the new connectome spreadsheet being integrated

@pgleeson Please edit this post or comment with additional specs for what should be included in this page other than what I have listed.

@pgleeson
Copy link
Member

pgleeson commented Jul 7, 2015

Looks good so far...

Btw, I thought the documentation had been translated to markdown at some stage..?

@travs
Copy link
Author

travs commented Jul 7, 2015

@pgleeson In some other repos it has, but not here because of the heavy usage of docstrings/autodocs. When Mkdocs supports this (specifically, the version that RTD is using), we can switch over easily.

@slarson slarson self-assigned this Aug 14, 2015
travs pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 16, 2015
Adds bibtext entries to insert_worm.py
Adds citations to docs page
Removes print_evidence from insert_worm.py

Fixes #230
Fixes #239
Related to #177
travs pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 18, 2015
travs pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 23, 2015
Adds citations to docs page

Related to #177

`git reflog` to the rescue... :)
slarson added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 18, 2015
slarson added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 18, 2015
slarson added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 18, 2015
slarson added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 18, 2015
@slarson
Copy link
Member

slarson commented Dec 18, 2015

@pgleeson Check out the latest. I've fleshed it out considerably. I don't know what kind of standard you are looking for in terms of "discussion of labs involved". Could you give an example in the context of what's there now?

@pgleeson
Copy link
Member

pgleeson commented Jan 7, 2016

@slarson That's certainly more like what's needed. It would be great to:

See openworm/CElegansNeuroML#49 for discussion on using the new connectome in c302 etc.

@slarson
Copy link
Member

slarson commented Jan 18, 2016

OK, great! Closing this one for now. Those suggestions have been moved into issues on their own repos over here:

openworm/openworm.github.io#60 openworm/openworm_docs#37

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants