DOC: Remove outdated docs about NumPy's broadcasting #55427
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: RedGuy12 <[email protected]>
datapythonista
changed the title
datapythonista
approved these changes
Oct 7, 2023
mroeschke
approved these changes
Oct 9, 2023
|
Thanks @RedGuy12 |
|
@meeseeksdev backport to 2.1.x |
meeseeksmachine
pushed a commit
to meeseeksmachine/pandas
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 9, 2023
jorisvandenbossche
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 9, 2023
…umPy's broadcasting) (#55896) Backport PR #55427: DOC: Remove outdated docs about NumPy's broadcasting Co-authored-by: cobalt <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
NumPy v1.25.0 removes the previosuly deprecated behavior of returning
Falsewhen an array could not be broadcast. It now raises aValueError, same as Pandas. numpy/numpy#22707The Pandas documentation previously highlighted this discrepancy. However, since it now throws an error, it is causing building the documentation to fail.
I removed the mention of NumPy in this section since the behavior is mostly the same (NumPy still treats an array of one item as a scalar, while Pandas doesn't). Would it be preferable to mention that they act the same now?