not so understandable codeCheck results

[orichters]

Two things I identified with @robinhasse:

---

If a global switch is added to a not_used.txt (which apparently is not desired), the error message is:

2: Could not find any declaration for cm_rcp_scen_build

See https://github.com/remindmodel/remind/runs/6772164690. A better error message would be really desirable. By the way, where can I find a description of what is supposed to enter not_used.txt?

---

If code looks like that, note the indentation with blanks:

  Parameter
  p_extRegiccsinjecrateRegi(ext_regi) "Regional CCS injection rate factor. 1/a. (extended regions)" / %c_ccsinjecrateRegi% /;

a warning is raised as in this remind PR check, stating:

: "Parameter" does not follow the given naming convetions (description = "")!

But strangely enough, this warning does not impede the script from stating All codeCheck tests passed!. Maybe, because the warning has no parameter name but rather an empty string? It would be appreciated if incorrect blanks before stating "Parameter" etc. would get a more understandable error code.

[giannou]

where can I find a description of what is supposed to enter not_used.txt?

A somewhat hidden description is found here

[giannou]

Regarding the indentation with blanks: it happens also elsewhere in the code so maybe it's not what generates the warning? [Update: the indentation with blanks causes the warning]

How about the slash / in the description field? In any case I'm looking also into that and will report back soon [Update: looks like this is also normal]

[orichters]

Reminds me of

• a similar problem here: manipulateConfig() breaks REMIND code with slashes in comments lucode2#88
• and the fix here: bugfix in manipulateConfig lucode2#89

[giannou]

The

indentation with blanks

issue was fixed with #25.

The

If a global switch is added to a not_used.txt

issue seems to be a bug and will be treated and discussed further here.