-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
planner: dynamic partition prune should be aware of the caller‘s on-missing action #43686
Labels
affects-5.0
This bug affects 5.0.x versions.
affects-5.1
This bug affects 5.1.x versions.
affects-5.2
This bug affects 5.2.x versions.
affects-5.3
This bug affects 5.3.x versions.
affects-5.4
This bug affects 5.4.x versions.
affects-6.1
affects-6.5
affects-7.1
severity/moderate
sig/sql-infra
SIG: SQL Infra
type/bug
The issue is confirmed as a bug.
Comments
AilinKid
added
type/bug
The issue is confirmed as a bug.
sig/planner
SIG: Planner
severity/moderate
sig/sql-infra
SIG: SQL Infra
labels
May 10, 2023
12 tasks
12 tasks
bb7133
pushed a commit
to bb7133/tidb
that referenced
this issue
May 15, 2023
12 tasks
VelocityLight
added
affects-5.1
This bug affects 5.1.x versions.
affects-5.4
This bug affects 5.4.x versions.
affects-7.1
affects-5.2
This bug affects 5.2.x versions.
affects-5.0
This bug affects 5.0.x versions.
affects-6.5
affects-6.1
affects-5.3
This bug affects 5.3.x versions.
labels
May 17, 2023
12 tasks
12 tasks
12 tasks
This was referenced Jun 5, 2023
AilinKid
added a commit
to AilinKid/tidb
that referenced
this issue
Jun 6, 2023
… it's a table range scan (pingcap#44414) close pingcap#43686
12 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
affects-5.0
This bug affects 5.0.x versions.
affects-5.1
This bug affects 5.1.x versions.
affects-5.2
This bug affects 5.2.x versions.
affects-5.3
This bug affects 5.3.x versions.
affects-5.4
This bug affects 5.4.x versions.
affects-6.1
affects-6.5
affects-7.1
severity/moderate
sig/sql-infra
SIG: SQL Infra
type/bug
The issue is confirmed as a bug.
Bug Report
Please answer these questions before submitting your issue. Thanks!
1. Minimal reproduce step (Required)
2. What did you expect to see? (Required)
locate partition error doesn't mean it's indeed an error.
Under the index lookup scenario, the on-missing action of locate partition should return no rows in
fetchInnerResuts
back to the callerIndexLookUpJoin
3. What did you see instead (Required)
locate partition error
4. What is your TiDB version? (Required)
all versions, even master
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: