Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

executor: fix KVRange bug for index join with dynamic partition pruning (#33483) #33579

Closed

Conversation

ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor

@ti-srebot ti-srebot commented Mar 30, 2022

cherry-pick #33483 to release-5.1
You can switch your code base to this Pull Request by using git-extras:

# In tidb repo:
git pr https://github.com/pingcap/tidb/pull/33579

After apply modifications, you can push your change to this PR via:

git push [email protected]:ti-srebot/tidb.git pr/33579:release-5.1-e56013779bff

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #33231

Problem Summary:

What is changed and how it works?

Please see the comments in the code and #33231 (comment).

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No code

Side effects

  • None

Documentation

  • NA

Release note

Fix the issue that query result might be wrong when using dynamic partition pruning mode with index join.

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has not been approved.

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

@ti-srebot: This cherry pick PR is for a release branch and has not yet been approved by release team.
Adding the do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved label.

To merge this cherry pick, it must first be approved by the collaborators.

AFTER it has been approved by collaborators, please ping the release team in a comment to request a cherry pick review.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-all-tests

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. and removed do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. labels Mar 30, 2022
@ti-srebot ti-srebot added size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. type/5.1-cherry-pick labels Mar 30, 2022
@ti-srebot ti-srebot added this to the v5.1.4 milestone Mar 30, 2022
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Mar 30, 2022
@ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bb7133 you're already a collaborator in bot's repo.

@VelocityLight
Copy link

This pull request is closed because it's related version has closed automatic cherry-picking.
If it's still needed, you can reopen it or just regenerate it using bot,
see:

You can find more details at:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. type/5.1-cherry-pick
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants