Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

planner: fix order by sub-query couldn't find outer correlated columns (#33640) #33687

Closed

Conversation

ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor

@ti-srebot ti-srebot commented Apr 2, 2022

cherry-pick #33640 to release-5.2
You can switch your code base to this Pull Request by using git-extras:

# In tidb repo:
git pr https://github.com/pingcap/tidb/pull/33687

After apply modifications, you can push your change to this PR via:

git push [email protected]:ti-srebot/tidb.git pr/33687:release-5.2-334508e13d55

Signed-off-by: AilinKid [email protected]

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #26945

Problem Summary:

DROP TABLE IF EXISTS t1, t2;
CREATE TABLE t1 (a INT, b INT);
CREATE TABLE t2 (a INT, b INT);
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (1, 1);
INSERT INTO t2 VALUES (1, 1);
SELECT one.a FROM t1 one ORDER BY (SELECT two.b FROM t2 two WHERE two.a = one.b);

What is changed and how it works?

fetch the correlated column in order-by subquery out to select fields, building it as an Auxiliary one, which will be stored as p.schema() (passing as outer schema when enter subquery) when we try to build order-by clause. Otherwise it couldn't find that correlated column.

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No code

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

None

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has not been approved.

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-all-tests

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. and removed do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. labels Apr 2, 2022
@ti-srebot ti-srebot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. type/5.2-cherry-pick labels Apr 2, 2022
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot removed the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Apr 2, 2022
@ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor Author

@AilinKid you're already a collaborator in bot's repo.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. label Apr 2, 2022
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Apr 13, 2022
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

@ti-srebot: PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@VelocityLight
Copy link

This pull request is closed because it's related version has closed automatic cherry-picking.
If it's still needed, you can reopen it or just regenerate it using bot,
see:

You can find more details at:

@VelocityLight VelocityLight added cherry-pick-approved Cherry pick PR approved by release team. and removed do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved labels Sep 21, 2022
@VelocityLight VelocityLight added do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved and removed cherry-pick-approved Cherry pick PR approved by release team. labels Nov 2, 2022
@VelocityLight VelocityLight added cherry-pick-approved Cherry pick PR approved by release team. and removed do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved labels Feb 27, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cherry-pick-approved Cherry pick PR approved by release team. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. type/5.2-cherry-pick
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants