-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
parser: Sort keywords #48851
parser: Sort keywords #48851
Conversation
Hi @dveeden. Thanks for your PR. PRs from untrusted users cannot be marked as trusted with I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #48851 +/- ##
================================================
+ Coverage 70.9922% 72.5439% +1.5516%
================================================
Files 1368 1391 +23
Lines 403975 416545 +12570
================================================
+ Hits 286791 302178 +15387
+ Misses 97214 95378 -1836
+ Partials 19970 18989 -981
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
Tested with func TestKeywordsSorting(t *testing.T) {
for i, kw := range parser.Keywords {
if i > 1 && parser.Keywords[i-1].Word > kw.Word && parser.Keywords[i-1].Reserved == kw.Reserved {
t.Errorf("%s should come after %s, please update parser.y and re-generate keywords.go\n",
parser.Keywords[i-1].Word, kw.Word)
}
}
} |
/retest |
@dveeden: Cannot trigger testing until a trusted user reviews the PR and leaves an In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/ok-to-test |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, just one question about consistency with all upper case keywords.
@dveeden It needs @eason or @yudongusa‘s approve |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: bb7133, easonn7, mjonss, tangenta The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <[email protected]>
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch |
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close #48850
Problem Summary:
What changed and how does it work?
Check List
Tests
Side effects
Documentation
Release note
Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.