Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

store/copr: partly revert pr/35975, do it correctly this time #55196

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Aug 6, 2024

Conversation

tiancaiamao
Copy link
Contributor

@tiancaiamao tiancaiamao commented Aug 5, 2024

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #54969

Problem Summary:

What changed and how does it work?

#55155 try to revert pr/35975 but not clean, coupling with #41500 and bring bugs. PartitionNum is 1 even on non-partitioned table.

Do it correctly in this PR.
The new behaviour now:

  • The 'select ... where ... order by ...' query will not reduce distsql concurrency to 2 (change)
  • The simple 'select ... limit N' query, when N < 10000 , distsql concurrency is set to 1 (keep the behavior no change)
    • The same 'select ... limit N' query, on partitioned table, distsql concurrency is set to partition number (keep the behavior no change)

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No need to test
    • I checked and no code files have been changed.

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Aug 5, 2024
Copy link

tiprow bot commented Aug 5, 2024

Hi @tiancaiamao. Thanks for your PR.

PRs from untrusted users cannot be marked as trusted with /ok-to-test in this repo meaning untrusted PR authors can never trigger tests themselves. Collaborators can still trigger tests on the PR using /test all.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

└─Limit_12 204.80 0 cop[tikv] NULL NULL offset:0, count:100000 <memory> <disk>
└─Selection_11 204.80 0 cop[tikv] NULL NULL eq(executor__issues.pt.val, 125) <memory> <disk>
└─TableFullScan_10 256.00 0 cop[tikv] table:pt NULL keep order:false, stats:partial[val:missing] <memory> <disk>
explain analyze select * from pt order by id limit 100; # expected distsql concurrency 7, but currently get 1, see issue #55190
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Known issue #55190
Will not be fixed in this PR.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 5, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 74.8170%. Comparing base (07c35e8) to head (4e9dfc4).
Report is 277 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##             master     #55196        +/-   ##
================================================
+ Coverage   74.7289%   74.8170%   +0.0880%     
================================================
  Files          1570       1570                
  Lines        364634     439916     +75282     
================================================
+ Hits         272487     329132     +56645     
- Misses        72419      90561     +18142     
- Partials      19728      20223       +495     
Flag Coverage Δ
integration 49.4801% <82.1428%> (?)
unit 71.7868% <100.0000%> (-1.8238%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components Coverage Δ
dumpling 52.9567% <ø> (-2.2327%) ⬇️
parser ∅ <ø> (∅)
br 52.4987% <ø> (+4.8242%) ⬆️

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added approved needs-1-more-lgtm Indicates a PR needs 1 more LGTM. labels Aug 5, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@windtalker windtalker left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added lgtm and removed needs-1-more-lgtm Indicates a PR needs 1 more LGTM. labels Aug 5, 2024
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Aug 5, 2024

[LGTM Timeline notifier]

Timeline:

  • 2024-08-05 10:41:08.140581289 +0000 UTC m=+262198.007680400: ☑️ agreed by Defined2014.
  • 2024-08-05 11:57:54.128300519 +0000 UTC m=+266803.995399608: ☑️ agreed by windtalker.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Aug 5, 2024
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Aug 5, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Defined2014, windtalker

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@tiancaiamao tiancaiamao changed the title store/copr: revert pr/35975, do it correctly this time store/copr: partly revert pr/35975, do it correctly this time Aug 5, 2024
@hawkingrei
Copy link
Member

/ok-to-test

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the ok-to-test Indicates a PR is ready to be tested. label Aug 5, 2024
@winoros winoros added needs-cherry-pick-release-7.5 Should cherry pick this PR to release-7.5 branch. needs-cherry-pick-release-8.1 Should cherry pick this PR to release-8.1 branch. labels Aug 5, 2024
@winoros
Copy link
Member

winoros commented Aug 5, 2024

Is 6.5 affected by this problem?

@tiancaiamao
Copy link
Contributor Author

Is 6.5 affected by this problem?

Yes

@tiancaiamao
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test unit-test

#55207

Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Aug 6, 2024

@tiancaiamao: The specified target(s) for /test were not found.
The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

  • /test build
  • /test check-dev
  • /test check-dev2
  • /test mysql-test
  • /test pull-br-integration-test
  • /test pull-integration-ddl-test
  • /test pull-lightning-integration-test
  • /test pull-mysql-client-test
  • /test unit-test

The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:

  • /test canary-notify-when-compatibility-sections-changed
  • /test pingcap/tidb/canary_ghpr_unit_test
  • /test pull-common-test
  • /test pull-e2e-test
  • /test pull-integration-common-test
  • /test pull-integration-copr-test
  • /test pull-integration-jdbc-test
  • /test pull-integration-mysql-test
  • /test pull-integration-nodejs-test
  • /test pull-sqllogic-test
  • /test pull-tiflash-test

Use /test all to run the following jobs that were automatically triggered:

  • pingcap/tidb/ghpr_build
  • pingcap/tidb/ghpr_check
  • pingcap/tidb/ghpr_check2
  • pingcap/tidb/ghpr_mysql_test
  • pingcap/tidb/ghpr_unit_test
  • pingcap/tidb/pull_integration_ddl_test
  • pingcap/tidb/pull_mysql_client_test

In response to this:

/test unit-test

#55207

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Copy link

tiprow bot commented Aug 6, 2024

@tiancaiamao: The specified target(s) for /test were not found.
The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

  • /test fast_test_tiprow
  • /test tidb_parser_test

Use /test all to run all jobs.

In response to this:

/test unit-test

#55207

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@tiancaiamao
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test check-dev

Copy link

tiprow bot commented Aug 6, 2024

@tiancaiamao: The specified target(s) for /test were not found.
The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

  • /test fast_test_tiprow
  • /test tidb_parser_test

Use /test all to run all jobs.

In response to this:

/test check-dev

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot merged commit 9fee330 into pingcap:master Aug 6, 2024
22 of 23 checks passed
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch release-7.5: #55211.

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch release-8.1: #55212.

ti-chi-bot pushed a commit to ti-chi-bot/tidb that referenced this pull request Aug 6, 2024
@tiancaiamao tiancaiamao deleted the re branch August 6, 2024 05:43
tiancaiamao added a commit to tiancaiamao/tidb that referenced this pull request Aug 6, 2024
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the needs-cherry-pick-release-6.5 Should cherry pick this PR to release-6.5 branch. label Aug 26, 2024
ti-chi-bot pushed a commit to ti-chi-bot/tidb that referenced this pull request Aug 26, 2024
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch release-6.5: #55645.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the needs-cherry-pick-release-7.1 Should cherry pick this PR to release-7.1 branch. label Sep 11, 2024
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch release-7.1: #56009.

ti-chi-bot pushed a commit to ti-chi-bot/tidb that referenced this pull request Sep 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved lgtm needs-cherry-pick-release-6.5 Should cherry pick this PR to release-6.5 branch. needs-cherry-pick-release-7.1 Should cherry pick this PR to release-7.1 branch. needs-cherry-pick-release-7.5 Should cherry pick this PR to release-7.5 branch. needs-cherry-pick-release-8.1 Should cherry pick this PR to release-8.1 branch. ok-to-test Indicates a PR is ready to be tested. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

query is very slow when keep order is true
6 participants