store/copr: revert pr/35975, do not reduce concurrency for keep order coprocessor request (#55141)

[ti-chi-bot]

This is an automated cherry-pick of #55141

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #54969

Problem Summary:

What changed and how does it work?

In the past, #35975 reduce coprocessor concurrency to 2 for the keep order query.
But recently we meet an oncall case that the change cause performance regression.

Balance the memory usage and concurrency is a difficult job, we need more tests and expirements to reach the conclusion.
Currently we can simply set TiFlash to not reduce concurrency, when a user using TiFlash, the tidb memory usage would not be a top concern (their hardware must be better).

Check List

Tests

• Unit test
• Integration test
• Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)

See comments below

• No need to test

  • I checked and no code files have been changed.

One line change, just revert part of the previous optimization.

Side effects

• Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
• Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
• Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

• Affects user behaviors
• Contains syntax changes
• Contains variable changes
• Contains experimental features
• Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Please upload report for BASE (release-7.5@5665343). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Additional details and impacted files

@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##             release-7.5     #56007   +/-   ##
================================================
  Coverage               ?   72.0090%           
================================================
  Files                  ?       1413           
  Lines                  ?     411854           
  Branches               ?          0           
================================================
  Hits                   ?     296572           
  Misses                 ?      95387           
  Partials               ?      19895           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unit	72.0090% <100.0000%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components	Coverage Δ
dumpling	52.9400% <0.0000%> (?)
parser	∅ <0.0000%> (?)
br	53.5078% <0.0000%> (?)

[ti-chi-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: lcwangchao

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [lcwangchao]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[ti-chi-bot]

[LGTM Timeline notifier]

Timeline:

• 2024-09-23 01:04:20.680280839 +0000 UTC m=+1441530.420704795: ☑️ agreed by lcwangchao.

[tiancaiamao]

Not the correct fix, use this one instead #55211