-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 409
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Planner: planner without DAGQueryBlock
#5381
Conversation
[REVIEW NOTIFICATION] This pull request has been approved by:
To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review. |
05fd9bd
to
7693e14
Compare
/run-integration-test |
Coverage for changed files
Coverage summary
full coverage report (for internal network access only) |
/run-all-tests |
Coverage for changed files
Coverage summary
full coverage report (for internal network access only) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
auto & list_based_executors_order = dag_context.list_based_executors_order; | ||
PhysicalPlanVisitor::visitPostOrder(root_node, [&](const PhysicalPlanNodePtr & plan) { | ||
assert(plan); | ||
if (plan->isRecordProfileStreams()) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
likely?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
But FinalProjection.isRecordProfileStreams() == false
, so I think it's better not to add likely
/merge |
@SeaRise: It seems you want to merge this PR, I will help you trigger all the tests: /run-all-tests You only need to trigger If you have any questions about the PR merge process, please refer to pr process. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository. |
This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge. Commit hash: 3140faa
|
/run-integration-test |
/merge |
@SeaRise: It seems you want to merge this PR, I will help you trigger all the tests: /run-all-tests You only need to trigger If you have any questions about the PR merge process, please refer to pr process. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository. |
This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge. Commit hash: 00409a5
|
Coverage for changed files
Coverage summary
full coverage report (for internal network access only) |
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: ref #4739
Problem Summary:
What is changed and how it works?
PhysicalSource
PlanQuerySource
Planner
run withoutDAGQueryBlock
Check List
Tests
Side effects
Documentation
Release note