Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Planner: planner without DAGQueryBlock #5381

Merged
merged 37 commits into from
Aug 2, 2022

Conversation

SeaRise
Copy link
Contributor

@SeaRise SeaRise commented Jul 15, 2022

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: ref #4739

Problem Summary:

What is changed and how it works?

  • remove PhysicalSource
  • implement PlanQuerySource
  • Planner run without DAGQueryBlock

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No code

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

None

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

ti-chi-bot commented Jul 15, 2022

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • windtalker
  • ywqzzy

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jul 15, 2022
@SeaRise SeaRise mentioned this pull request Jul 15, 2022
13 tasks
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jul 20, 2022
@SeaRise
Copy link
Contributor Author

SeaRise commented Jul 25, 2022

/run-integration-test

@sre-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

sre-bot commented Aug 1, 2022

Coverage for changed files

too many lines from llvm-cov, please refer to full report instead

Coverage summary

Functions  MissedFunctions  Executed  Lines   MissedLines  Cover
18991      9485             50.06%    216933  95780        55.85%

full coverage report (for internal network access only)

@SeaRise
Copy link
Contributor Author

SeaRise commented Aug 1, 2022

/run-all-tests

@sre-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

sre-bot commented Aug 1, 2022

Coverage for changed files

too many lines from llvm-cov, please refer to full report instead

Coverage summary

Functions  MissedFunctions  Executed  Lines   MissedLines  Cover
18991      9480             50.08%    216933  95754        55.86%

full coverage report (for internal network access only)

@SeaRise SeaRise requested a review from windtalker August 2, 2022 03:08
Copy link
Contributor

@windtalker windtalker left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. label Aug 2, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@ywqzzy ywqzzy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

auto & list_based_executors_order = dag_context.list_based_executors_order;
PhysicalPlanVisitor::visitPostOrder(root_node, [&](const PhysicalPlanNodePtr & plan) {
assert(plan);
if (plan->isRecordProfileStreams())
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

likely?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

But FinalProjection.isRecordProfileStreams() == false, so I think it's better not to add likely

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. and removed status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. labels Aug 2, 2022
@SeaRise
Copy link
Contributor Author

SeaRise commented Aug 2, 2022

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

@SeaRise: It seems you want to merge this PR, I will help you trigger all the tests:

/run-all-tests

You only need to trigger /merge once, and if the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes.

If you have any questions about the PR merge process, please refer to pr process.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: 3140faa

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Aug 2, 2022
@SeaRise
Copy link
Contributor Author

SeaRise commented Aug 2, 2022

/run-integration-test

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot removed the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Aug 2, 2022
@SeaRise
Copy link
Contributor Author

SeaRise commented Aug 2, 2022

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

@SeaRise: It seems you want to merge this PR, I will help you trigger all the tests:

/run-all-tests

You only need to trigger /merge once, and if the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes.

If you have any questions about the PR merge process, please refer to pr process.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: 00409a5

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Aug 2, 2022
@sre-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

sre-bot commented Aug 2, 2022

Coverage for changed files

too many lines from llvm-cov, please refer to full report instead

Coverage summary

Functions  MissedFunctions  Executed  Lines   MissedLines  Cover
18991      9483             50.07%    216933  95783        55.85%

full coverage report (for internal network access only)

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot merged commit 0f26fe8 into pingcap:planner_refactory Aug 2, 2022
@SeaRise SeaRise deleted the remove_qb branch December 13, 2022 10:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants