Add pylint in the continuous integration and pre-commit

[Pierre-Sassoulas]

Follow-up to #6

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (1c2613b) 86.96% compared to head (2fbc3db) 86.96%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master       #7   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   86.96%   86.96%           
=======================================
  Files          33       33           
  Lines         399      399           
  Branches       81       81           
=======================================
  Hits          347      347           
  Misses         48       48           
  Partials        4        4           

Files	Coverage Δ
tests/base_tester.py	88.70% <100.00%> (ø)

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[stdedos]

idk why codecov is crying for, ignore it

[stdedos]

You have, at least, missed good-names from the old config.

Some of those names ofc, are coming from the pylint (<3?) limitation that two-lettered variables are not acceptable (I don't remember the issue number).

Let me contemplate on the configuration? Otherwise this is solid work!

[Pierre-Sassoulas]

For good names everything is either the pylint default or something not required now that pylint does not raise for <3 letters variables anymore

-good-names=ex,Run,_,i,j,k, # Defaults
-           rc,             # Return variable of `subprocess.xxx` methods
-           df,             # Panda's DataFrame variable
-           cd,             # Method/Context function that does `cd`. `cwd` is not much better

[stdedos]

Latest changes bring over some of the things I like. I think this is done for now, yes.

[Pierre-Sassoulas]

Great !