Add test for Sse method indexing on native

[mocenas]

Summary

Add tests for quarkusio/quarkus#36986

Please select the relevant options.

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• Dependency update
• Refactoring
• Backport
• New scenario (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• This change requires a documentation update
• This change requires execution against OCP (use run tests phrase in comment)

Checklist:

• Methods and classes used in PR scenarios are meaningful
• Commits are well encapsulated and follow the best practices

[mocenas]

run tests

[fedinskiy]

But you probably want to squash these two commits together

[jedla97]

@mocenas I looking at it and I thing it is covered by #1517 as I disable it here https://github.com/quarkus-qe/quarkus-test-suite/blob/main/http/http-advanced-reactive/src/test/java/io/quarkus/ts/http/advanced/reactive/BaseHttpAdvancedReactiveIT.java#L453
So I don't know if we want to merge almost same code except you seem to have little different updates method. As this is both in http reactive part of TS. Can you look at it if it's test different thing or it's the same?

Btw in that PR it was updated to not use only String as StringBuilder is not thread safe and LockSupport was replaced by CountDownLatch

[mocenas]

@mocenas I looking at it and I thing it is covered by #1517 as I disable it here https://github.com/quarkus-qe/quarkus-test-suite/blob/main/http/http-advanced-reactive/src/test/java/io/quarkus/ts/http/advanced/reactive/BaseHttpAdvancedReactiveIT.java#L453 So I don't know if we want to merge almost same code except you seem to have little different updates method. As this is both in http reactive part of TS. Can you look at it if it's test different thing or it's the same?

Btw in that PR it was updated to not use only String as StringBuilder is not thread safe and LockSupport was replaced by CountDownLatch

I'm unable to reproduce the issue quarkusio/quarkus#36986 with this test. I was not able to reproduce the issue in the module "http-advanced-reactive" at all. That's why I put it in rest-client-reactive module. I assume it is because it uses "jackson" version of rest client, but I'm not sure.

I tried to reproduce it with quarkus-bom v 3.5.1. If you have better luck reproducing it, I agree it would be better to not duplicate this, otherwise we will have to.

I agree that using thread safe things is better.

[mocenas]

@jedla97 Please review ^^ if it is possible to reproduce this issue with current code, or should we merge this PR.

[jedla97]

@mocenas thanks for update and change it to thread safe. Just one small thing can you squash the commits to one.

Tested it and I was unable to reproduce the error (still don't know why). So yes we need to merge this. Thanks for looking at it and point it to me.

[mocenas]

I will squash the commits on github merge.

[jedla97]

OK. I know it exist but wasn't sure how the result will look. Now I know 😄