-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 93
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Release v0.2.0 #233
Comments
See PR #234 |
@raszi any news on this? We'd love to upgrade to 0.2.0 for exceljs |
When will this release? I don't even use |
@raszi What about a new release on npmjs.com? |
Still waiting for it for months. Some time ago $ rm -Rf node_modules
$ yarn remove tmp
$ yarn cache clean
$ yarn add raszi/node-tmp#ae61bb63dbc05ff66678b992a14a19f44ab899ed |
@ezze @nomcopter @raszi just released version 0.2.0 to npmjs. Have fun. |
Thanks a bunch! |
@silkentrance Thanks for doing it. Unfortunately, new release solving At the moment, we can't live with it, so I created forked npm package |
Hi @silkentrance, @raszi, the semantic versioning spec adopted by most In this release you've published |
In order to overcome the most pressing issues: #216, #213, #207, #218, #236, #237, #238, #176, #156.
I make the following proposal in order to further stabilize tmp and to get a new release out of the door as soon as possible.
SIGINT handler (BREAKING CHANGE)
the SIGINT handler will be removed
The user is responsible for installing a SIGINT handler that will exit the process so that the exit handler gets called.
EXIT handler
The exit handler can be simplified to just a call to the internal garbage collector function.
handler installation
The safe handler installation had been a work around for older jest versions. With jest now using child processes and experimental worker threads, this should no longer be an issue and we can remove that code altogether. See also Temporary files not beeing removed after tests are completed (Jest, Windows) #229
CHANGELOG
introduce a changelog which we will maintain manually for now
@raszi please have a look and tell me if that would suit you. Exposing the garbage collector as a callable has its own issues, see the comments in #216.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: