Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[RLlib] Change Waterworld v3 to v4 #31820

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 31, 2023

Conversation

ArturNiederfahrenhorst
Copy link
Contributor

Signed-off-by: Artur Niederfahrenhorst [email protected]

Why are these changes needed?

Waterworld v3 was outdated and now throws an error. According to pettingzoo this was simply a refactor and they don't mentioned any changes to the env dynamics.

Related issue number

#31786

Checks

  • I've signed off every commit(by using the -s flag, i.e., git commit -s) in this PR.
  • I've run scripts/format.sh to lint the changes in this PR.
  • I've included any doc changes needed for https://docs.ray.io/en/master/.
  • I've made sure the tests are passing. Note that there might be a few flaky tests, see the recent failures at https://flakey-tests.ray.io/
  • Testing Strategy
    • Unit tests
    • Release tests
    • This PR is not tested :(

Signed-off-by: Artur Niederfahrenhorst <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Artur Niederfahrenhorst <[email protected]>
Copy link
Contributor

@sven1977 sven1977 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Thanks for the fix and for reinstating this test case @ArturNiederfahrenhorst !

@sven1977 sven1977 merged commit 61c411f into ray-project:master Jan 31, 2023
@ArturNiederfahrenhorst
Copy link
Contributor Author

@gjoliver I should've payed attention to the failing test. This PR introduces an error in CI.
Revert or fix: #32117

clarng pushed a commit to clarng/ray that referenced this pull request Jan 31, 2023
edoakes pushed a commit to edoakes/ray that referenced this pull request Mar 22, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants