Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add scenario type to dst #278

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 8, 2024
Merged

Conversation

dfarr
Copy link
Member

@dfarr dfarr commented Apr 5, 2024

No description provided.

@dfarr dfarr requested a review from vaibhawvipul April 5, 2024 17:31
@vaibhawvipul vaibhawvipul merged commit 4caa707 into issue-246-bug-fix Apr 8, 2024
@vaibhawvipul vaibhawvipul deleted the issue-246/scenario branch April 8, 2024 03:51
vaibhawvipul added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 10, 2024
* handle aio errors

* added cqe assert and remove redundant logs

* add a check that req is not nil

* assert sqe and cqe callbacks

* bug fixes

* using error.New()

* handling partial failures

* create notfound error and ignoring that

* removing redundant nil checks

* bug fix

* adding fault injection mode and disabling certain asserts in that mode

* adding to cmd faultInjectionMode

* Defining scenario type

* Add scenario type to dst (#278)

* adding scenario type to dst

* lint errors

* assertig submission and metadata

* testing the fault injection path for model

* adding test cases

* refactoring fault injection loop

* code refactor

* created a new error type for fault injection dst

---------

Co-authored-by: David Farr <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants