Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

more on worker config #1333

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

more on worker config #1333

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

AhmedSoliman
Copy link
Contributor

@AhmedSoliman AhmedSoliman commented Mar 27, 2024

More re-org and cleanup. We need to move away from the `Options::build()` style:
- We should treat configuration as data-only structures that won't be consumed on service creation
- We pave the way for updateable config, components will own a "projection" to the config in the future instead of consuming it on startup

This is not the final structure, many changes are transitional
Copy link

Test Results

 92 files  ±0   92 suites  ±0   10m 34s ⏱️ +4s
 73 tests  - 6   65 ✅  - 12  2 💤 ±0   6 ❌ + 6 
199 runs   - 6  183 ✅  - 16  6 💤 ±0  10 ❌ +10 

For more details on these failures, see this check.

Results for commit 48c40fa. ± Comparison against base commit 7553ccc.

This pull request removes 8 and adds 2 tests. Note that renamed tests count towards both.
dev.restate.e2e.JavaNonDeterminismTest ‑ backgroundInvokeWithDifferentTargets
dev.restate.e2e.JavaNonDeterminismTest ‑ callDifferentMethod
dev.restate.e2e.JavaNonDeterminismTest ‑ leftSleepRightCall
dev.restate.e2e.JavaNonDeterminismTest ‑ setDifferentKey
dev.restate.e2e.NodeNonDeterminismTest ‑ backgroundInvokeWithDifferentTargets
dev.restate.e2e.NodeNonDeterminismTest ‑ callDifferentMethod
dev.restate.e2e.NodeNonDeterminismTest ‑ leftSleepRightCall
dev.restate.e2e.NodeNonDeterminismTest ‑ setDifferentKey
dev.restate.e2e.JavaNonDeterminismTest ‑ initializationError
dev.restate.e2e.NodeNonDeterminismTest ‑ initializationError

@AhmedSoliman AhmedSoliman deleted the pr1333 branch April 30, 2024 13:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant