Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tweaks to benchmark client configuration #259

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 10, 2024
Merged

Conversation

brandur
Copy link
Contributor

@brandur brandur commented Mar 10, 2024

Some tweaks to the benchmark client in #254 which were meant to be
included there, but which I apparently forgot to push to GitHub before
pushing the "merge" button. See comment [1].

[1] #254 (comment)

Some tweaks to the benchmark client in #254 which were meant to be
included there, but which I apparently forgot to push to GitHub before
pushing the "merge" button. See comment [1].

[1] #254 (comment)
@brandur brandur merged commit d9a7fc3 into master Mar 10, 2024
10 checks passed
@brandur brandur deleted the brandur-bench-tweaks branch March 10, 2024 04:16
@brandur
Copy link
Contributor Author

brandur commented Mar 10, 2024

@bgentry Hah sorry for skipping approval. Thanks!

brandur added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 10, 2024
Follows up #259 that added some client configuration tweaks for
benchmarks along with comments describing their selection. This is my
fault for merging without waiting for review, but there was a minor
grammatical mistake and omitted word, which we fix up here.
bgentry pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 11, 2024
Follows up #259 that added some client configuration tweaks for
benchmarks along with comments describing their selection. This is my
fault for merging without waiting for review, but there was a minor
grammatical mistake and omitted word, which we fix up here.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants